Search for: "In Re Opinion of Supreme Court, Etc."
Results 321 - 340
of 986
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2017, 8:04 pm
Beijing Science & Technology University (1999) (re-issued as guiding case #38) and Yang Baoxi v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:50 am
Xiang Li, James Yang and Hui Zhang1 Background In the past several years, the Supreme People’s Court (“SPC”) of China has been working on establishing a precedent system appropriate for China. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 8:08 am
Now open your eyes: you’re in Court. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 6:28 am
The US Supreme Court has examined this issue in several cases. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 6:00 am
In 1991, the Supreme Court upheld a public servant’s rights to engage in political activities. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:34 am
” It could be: 1) Judge Hu is a fan of the Jeffrey Toobin book on the (US) Supreme Court, which has a Chinese translation thanks to Judge He Fan; or 2)he wants others to know that he has some basic knowledge about the US Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 5:52 am
All those opinions Judge Gorsuch wrote, joined, dissented, etc., gave you no hints? [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:39 pm
” I know what you’re probably thinking: 50 percent of US Supreme Court links don’t work? [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:35 pm
Because the Supreme Court is supreme on federal issues. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:30 am
The fresh ruling in December 2016 issued by the Supreme People’s Court of China (SPC) on the “Michael Jordan” 4+ years legal battle has attracted great attention (see a Guest Kat report here). [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:57 am
It would be surprising if it were otherwise, of course; after all, the whole point of these fan films is to re-interpret and modify the original stories, bending them into new shapes, to tell new stories involving these characters wearing these uniforms in these settings. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 10:07 am
First, the facts, from the Eighth Circuit opinion (Bennie v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:50 pm
Disregarding non-pecuniary costs (slowness, inefficiency, etc.), the Brazilian Judiciary is one of the most costly in the world, and Brazil spends more than any other OECD member countries on its judicial system. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Samsung v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
It got me to thinking: what sorts of things was the supreme court deciding back in the fall of 1908? [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
It got me to thinking: what sorts of things was the supreme court deciding back in the fall of 1908? [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:19 pm
Courts used to follow an old Supreme Court case called Conley v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:19 pm
Courts used to follow an old Supreme Court case called Conley v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:19 pm
Courts used to follow an old Supreme Court case called Conley v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 12:02 pm
Within a few days of each other, the Supreme Court of the United States and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had Apple v. [read post]
