Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices" Results 321 - 340 of 12,629
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2019, 10:47 am by John J. Donohue III
Absent compelling evidence that is nowhere to be found in the Court’s opinion, I could not possibly conclude that the Framers made such a choice. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am by John Jascob
In the 2014 case of Halliburton II, the Supreme Court re-affirmed the Basic v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 8:12 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Juvenile Law Opinions Body: SC19372 - In re Yasiel R. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 6:32 am
I'm impressed.On Monday afternoon, Justice Perluss published this opinion, which involved the application of res ipsa loquitor to a common carrier (in particular, an accident between a car and an MTA bus).On Tuesday morning, I wrote this, in which I noted that while I thought the opinion might be correct as a precedential matter, there were still some doctrinal things about it that bugged me.On Thursday, the Court of Appeal sua sponte amended its… [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 6:08 pm
" It's only halfway through the opinion that Justice Margulies finally quotes the statute. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:26 am by Evan Lee
Rosales-Mireles then pleaded guilty to illegal re-entry into the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 7:19 am by Katerina Linos and Kimberly Twist
Instead, Supreme Court justices write long and technical opinions, which then must be interpreted and distilled for public consumption by the media. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm by Marty Lederman
   In his opinion, Justice Thomas repeatedly upbraids the post-1964 Court for constructing a doctrine without regard to the “original meaning” of the First Amendment. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Sherif Girgis: Crowd-critiquing Justice Alito's Draft:  Historical Claims, Other Rights, Life Exceptions The leak of a draft opinion for the Court in Dobbs has enabled something remarkable:  the crowdsourced critique of a Supreme Court opinion before its release. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 4:11 am
Supreme Court's decision on the issue before us," wrote Justice Harry Lee Anstead in a dissenting opinion that was also supported by Justice Peggy Quince. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:10 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
" He also explained why he tries to make his judicial opinions clear and understandable to non-lawyers. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:15 pm by Erin Miller
 Rutledge is best known, however, for his towering dissent in In re Yamashita. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 12:19 pm by Will Yeatman
For example, Justice Stevens pejoratively described unpublished memoranda as “secret law. [read post]
30 May 2019, 2:42 pm
  And doesn't expand tort liability one iota.I wanted to quote from one or two paragraphs of Justice Cuellar's opinion to identify just why the Court doesn't allow businesses who were clearly damaged by the Southern California gas leaks -- but that nonetheless did not suffer actual "personal injury" or "property damage" -- to sue for the profits they undeniably lost from the thing. [read post]