Search for: "In The Matter of the Application of Public Law 16-1995" Results 321 - 340 of 395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by stevemehta
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT JOHN PORTER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Building Sys., Inc., 58 F.3d 16, 19 (2d Cir. 1995); see also JLM Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
" Motor vehicle rental and leasing defendants use the Graves Amendment as a tort defense to indirect or vicarious liability under state laws such as New York's Vehicle & Traffic Law § 388. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 2:31 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
When the matter goes for appeal, the appellate authority considers law mainly than laying emphasis on factual issues.6. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:16 am by Durga Rao
When the matter goes for appeal, the appellate authority considers law mainly than laying emphasis on factual issues. 6. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:22 am by Ashwin Sharma
See Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, Public Law 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009, Div. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:32 pm
Accordingly, the district court held that Otis's accused system could not meet the "information transmitter" and "recognition device" limitations and thus did not infringe the '094 patent as a matter of law. [read post]
Rodgin Cohen is a partner and chairman of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP focusing on acquisition, corporate governance, regulatory and securities law matters. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:22 pm by velvel
This upset several of the victims’ lawyers because they considered that the question of preferences goes way beyond cash-in/cash-out versus the November 30th statements, and involves important questions of law not involved in those matters. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Honda Motor Co., 52 F.3d 1311, 1316-1317 (5th Cir. 1995), the court vacated a punitive damages award under Mississippi law, inter alia, because the government did not require the safety device advocated by the plaintiffs. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
            The Risk of Participation              As a matter of law, most courts hold that a plaintiff who voluntarily participates in a sporting or recreational activity is owed no duty of care with respect to the obvious and foreseeable risks associated with that activity.… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
After public hearing and comment, DHCR adopted these changes, which became effective on December 20, 2000 (see 22 NY State Reg 18, 18-20 [Dec 20, 2000] [Notice of Adoption]). [read post]