Search for: "In re Carlson" Results 321 - 340 of 397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2014, 2:25 pm by DaveKelly
 In the case of In re Carlson decided in 2008, they decided that the tax refunds have to be prorated between the spouses based on the each spouse’s income. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:06 am by Tom Smith
“In blue states, where Democrats control both state and federal government, they’re being blamed doubly for high crime and inflation. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Fox News personalities, including Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity, have also promoted the drug.Perhaps this is why the Washington County Detention Center’s Dr. [read post]
30 May 2022, 7:17 am by John Floyd
    Congressional leaders Elsie Stefanik(R-NY), Lauren Boebert (R-CO), and media personalities Fox News Host Tucker Carlson and author J.D. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 8:48 am by James Innocent
I turned to Cory Carlson, Injury Relief’s consistently-knowledgable editor, to help me make sense of what I read. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:55 pm
We're a whopping 41 points behind DC Justice, whose roster was led by huge performances by AP, Greg Jennings, and Donavan McNabb. [read post]
15 May 2014, 2:25 pm by DaveKelly
 In the case of In re Carlson decided in 2008, they decided that the tax refunds have to be prorated between the spouses based on the each spouse’s income. [read post]
11 Oct 2005, 6:45 am
"We're kind of in a wait-and- see mode as to what the volume will be," Lipka said. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:38 am by admin
  “It’s sort of an epidemic,” said Megan Beaman Carlson, an attorney with California Rural Assistance League Inc., which is helping residents with lawsuits. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 4:26 am by Chris Seaton
And in alternative media, Tucker Carlson (who is an idiot) conducts a two hour interview with Vladmir Putin, who gladly lets Carlson’s stupid flag fly. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
In the meantime, we're conducting our own audit, but don't want to alarm them unnecessarily. [read post]