Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 321 - 340
of 13,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2012, 3:18 am
The Advice Company overcame of bifusal (i.e., two refusals) of its mark ATTORNEYPAGES for an on-line searchable directory of information of lawyers and legal services. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:34 am
In re Ambulatory Pain Pump-Chondrolysis Products Liability Litigation, J.P.M.L., MDL No. 2139 (4/14/10). [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:23 am
The question is this: under Rule 2.51(b), is the mark of the drawing, (i.e. the words HOME STATE) a substantially exact representation of the mark a used on or in connection with the goods? [read post]
7 May 2007, 8:41 am
Best I can tell, there is no ranking system change, we're now ranked by total of incoming links, i.e., 350, as opposed to 7,500, the previous position we'd hold in blog rank if we had 350 incoming links. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am
A classic example is found in the Bigio case itself i.e. that toothbrush references are analogous art to hairbrushes, both being brushes having a handle segment and a bristle substrate segment. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 8:31 am
The post Timing Is Everything, Even After You’re Gone appeared first on Berk Law Group. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:31 am
David Law by David Law Question: We’re a privately owned company with fewer than 100 employees. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 1:26 pm
The court further held that “re-registration” (renewal) is not subject to the ACPA if the initial registration was lawful. [read post]
11 May 2025, 11:00 pm
Actually, if you're woke, you're probably going to be offended by most of my 400+ posts in this blog. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:40 pm
§ 9-319(a) includes “proceeds– i.e., money and accounts receivable generated from the sale of goods. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 1:15 pm
See In re Bilski. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
The two-month period of R 136(1) is triggered by the removal of the cause of non-compliance, i.e. by the event which causes the party to become aware that a loss of rights had occurred. [1.4] R 136(1) lays down that a request for re-establishment must include the filing of a written request and the payment of a fee. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 8:34 am
by Dennis Crouch In re OATH HOLDINGS, INC. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:43 am
The public has better uses for the millions we're wasting on it. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:49 am
As we suggested in our previous post, the fact that the patents underlying MAD’s lawsuit are being re-examined could convince the judge in the lawsuit to keep the case on ice a little while longer (i.e., probably at least until the USPTO review is resolved). [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 3:27 pm
When you’re stuck in this situation, you can do two things: You can use YouTube’s transcription mode to manually copy and paste relevant parts of the YouTube video into your notes, or you can download the entire video transcript (i.e., its subtitles) in a single file to refer to it later…” [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:35 pm
Recent Changes to Patent Reissue Practice As discussed here at length, there have been two recent decisions of the CAFC that will impact patent reissue practice before the USPTO, In re Tanaka and In re Mostafazadeh. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:34 am
” And here’s the most significant part as it applies to our—i.e. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:10 pm
[Post by Venkat] In re Reverb Communications, FTC No. 092-3199 (Aug. 26, 2010) (Settlement) Professor Goldman has posted a bunch about the FTC's endorsement guidelines. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 1:08 pm
The timing of the Injunction (i.e., so close in time to the January 1, 2025 filing deadline) is somewhat unfortunate because we do not know what will happen in the Lawsuit. [read post]
