Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 4." Results 321 - 340 of 1,362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2007, 5:45 am by Denise
  The judge initially denied her request (asserting that it seemed to him she was changing it for fraudulent reasons - the only grounds the law allowed him to deny her request). [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 7:01 pm
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, GOVERNMENT LAW, INTERNATIONAL LAW In re Terrorist Bombings of U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 12:25 pm by Fortunat Nadima Nadima
Ce programme vise les petites et moyennes entreprises (moins de 500 employés). [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Thompson, No. 07-1014 "Denial of a petition for federal habeas relief is affirmed over petitioner's arguments that: 1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel during his state trial for murder; 2) the revised 28 U.S.C. section 2254(d)(1) violates Article III, the separation of powers, and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 7:57 am by Ashwin Sharma
(Note that not all offices process all types of applications and petitions.)Find the particular form number (in the left column) or form name (in the center column) in which you are interested. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Answer #4 You MUST provide each applicant with a complete copy of the entire petition (including the LCA), it is a REQUIREMENT, and you must retain a complete copy of the petition within the applicant’s immigration file (public access file). [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
It has been 4 months since USCIS received the petition from DOS. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 5:58 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The court granted Hallmark's special exceptions and required Chambers to re-plead his case. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In such circumstances and in the absence of any contention or indication that a BoA has refused to hear the petitioner, it cannot be established that the petitioner had no opportunity to comment within the meaning of A 113(1) (see R 4/08 [3.3]).[11] In decision R 4/08, the petitioner was the opponent and the decision related to that opponent’s alleged lack of opportunity to comment on the admissibility of the patent proprietor’s new requests. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:48 am by Albert Wan
United States, No. 10CV1659 JLS (POR), 2010 WL 4868062, at *3-4 (S.D. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
The UST also argues that based on the Debtor's lack of cooperation with the Audit, his failure to appear at the 341 Meeting and the initial hearing on the Motions to Dismiss on May 22, 2007, and his failure to comply with the Court's May 23 Order, he should be barred from filing a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition for a period of one year. [read post]