Search for: "In re Interest of Edward B."
Results 321 - 340
of 366
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2009, 2:24 pm
Question (b) was also dealt with quite shortly. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
EPO to make IPscore available for free (BLOG@IPJUR::COM) Help from the OHIM: CTM e-filing: program compatibility issues (Class 46) European qualifying examinations (EQEs) and languages (IPKat) Applications for geographical indications (GI) and protected designation of origins: BŘEZNICKÝ LEŽÁK, for Czech beer(GI) ; HAJDÚSÁGI TORMA, for Hungarian horseradish (PDO); Faba de Lourenzá for Spanish beans (GI);… [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 2:30 pm
(Reports on Sunday had the governor meeting with Edward Genson of Chicago's Genson & Gillespie, a well-regarded litigator best known for defending Conrad Black and R&B star R. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:34 am
The First Department apparently thinks there are three types applicable to liability insurance: (a) notice of accident; (b) notice of claim; and (c) notice of suit. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO releases ‘FY2008 Performance and Accountability Report’; claims success despite backlog (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Prospector) USPTO transition team appointed (Managing Intellectual Property) (Intellectual Property… [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
Section 102(b)(7) has its exceptions, however. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
Section 102(b)(7) has its exceptions, however. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:14 pm
" Edwards v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Biden’s re-election campaign as well as for Carper at the grunt level of getting out the vote and dropping literature. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Webb, No. 065775 In conviction for murder and related charges, denial of writ of habeas corpus is reversed where petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel was violated at trial and on appeal due to the actual conflict of interest his attorney labored under. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 12:07 am
"And we're finding a fundamental shift in the kinds of images they demand. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Edwards, No. 07-208 In the context of the Sixth Amendment right for defendants to represent themselves, the Constitution permits states to insist upon representation by counsel for those competent enough to stand trial under applicable precedent but who suffer from severe mental illness to the point where they are not competent to conduct trial proceedings by themselves. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
Rahall Appalachian Transportation Institute at West Virginia-based Marshall University, and an additional $25,000 to Edward Waters College, a Jacksonville-based historically black university with ties to Rep. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 5:24 pm
If you're interested in a preview of other Chapters from the Pioneers volume, Larry Ribstein's entry, Henry Manne: Intellectual Entreprenuer, and Kate Litvak's, Frank Easterbrook and Daniel Fischel, are both available on SSRN right now. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 11:57 am
§ 65-3.5(b)). [read post]
28 May 2008, 5:41 am
The panel included: Edward C. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Armstead, No. 05-5157 Convictions for felony willful copyright infringement for private financial gain are affirmed over allegations that the government failed to produce sufficient evidence that DVDs sold had an aggregate value of more than $2,500 in "retail value" as used in section 2319(b)(1). [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:12 pm
" In Re S.T., Donald and Carol T v. [read post]
