Search for: "In re Oracle"
Results 321 - 340
of 785
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2016, 7:21 am
At most Oracle's response might bring up stuff that would have to be discussed at a re-retrial. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 12:28 pm
Today, Roberts has published a followup, confirming that based on a tip, he found at least one funder—Oracle. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 12:20 pm
In her view, that move dramatically changes the amount of market harm that Oracle experienced, and the evidence should have been shared with the jury. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:11 am
But Oracle's counsel, Orrick's Annette Hurst, didn't give up. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Oracle v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 6:45 am
The post Explaining the Oracle v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:32 pm
We're not lovin' it, says General CourtThe CJEU upholds a decision to cancel a 'MACCOFFEE' trade mark on the basis that it was highly likely to be riding on the coat tails of McDonald's' marks. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2016-07-02 https://t.co/AQUQHUucAa -> Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2016-07-02 https://t.co/i30pg74GHT -> Cable companies take more Android box dealers to court to stamp out 'free TV' https://t.co/oPqKAZfql1 -> Despite Brexit vote, key EU powers vow to ratify CETA deal https://t.co/fI8TXHL8Vz -> Google gets civil restraint order Richardson v Google UK Ltd & Anor [2016] EWHC 1534 https://t.co/Yj36sp5Ssb -> No copyright… [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
NuVasive, Inc., No. 15-85 (Commil re-hash – mens rea requirement for inducement) 3. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:08 pm
Cir. 2015) Oracle America, Inc v Google Inc. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
There never was any doubt that the question of whether the infringement of a single design patent by a complex, multifunctional product warrants an unapportioned disgorgement of profits would be an extraordinarily important one. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/CZXHiGY96X -> Google's fair use defence succeeds against Oracle's copyright infringement claim https://t.co/ZAVUFTU20n -> Federal Court Issues Injunction Directed at Retailers of Set-Top Boxes With Copyright Infringing Applications https://t.co/HUsi6j7isG -> Link to Bell v https://t.co/ELYNrALMY8 case https://t.co/94ozzoPQSq -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-06-09 https://t.co/xIMVPSkZM5 -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-06-09… [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Oracle Corp., (Same questions as Cuozzo and now-dismissed Achates v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 3:00 am
More on re-mixing and re-mastering here and here.And over on the IPKat, two important recent decisions are reported. [read post]
30 May 2016, 10:00 pm
In a litigation that has been going on since 2010 (we started covering it in 2011), a federal jury concluded last Thursday that Google’s Android operating system does not infringe Oracle-owned copyrights because its re-implementation of 37 Java APIs is protected by “fair use. [read post]
26 May 2016, 1:03 pm
SAN FRANCISCO—Following a two-week trial, a federal jury concluded Thursday that Google's Android operating system does not infringe Oracle-owned copyrights because its re-implementation of 37 Java APIs is protected by "fair use. [read post]
22 May 2016, 7:17 am
There's a whole lot of doomsday stories out there on the Internet about Oracle v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:00 am
-> Certain Provisions of California Resale Royalty Act Are Preempted by the Copyright Act https://t.co/LgbvcSnoLA -> Frenemies of the TPP https://t.co/IlcKjKC0iX -> ‘We’re not under the gun’ to ratify TPP, says Liberal trade rep | https://t.co/LNJC2OvNa5 -> Oracle vs. [read post]
22 May 2016, 2:39 am
Last week Eric Sutton, who is Senior Patent Counsel at Oracle Corporation, published an open letter to the patent attorney profession on the IP Watchdog blog. [read post]
