Search for: "In the Interest of SB"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2012, 5:56 am
Kennedy: "So you're saying the government has a legitimate interest in not enforcing its laws? [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:24 am
Also, the good folks at the Texas Criminal Justice Coalition forwarded me a copy of Ana Yañez Correa's testimony to the committee on the subject, which I've uploaded here, for those interested in more detail. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:09 pm
Smith, Vice-Chairman Reagan, and Chairman McComish, and although it’s only the beginning and there are certainly battles ahead, it was inspiring to see a bi-partisan group of politicians courageous enough to stare down the empty threats and scare tactics of the banking industry and put the interests of constituents above everything else. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 7:30 am
To TYC employees and anyone else interested in the agency, use the comments as an Open Thread to say: What would you tell the Texas Legislature about SB 103 and its implementation? [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 9:24 am
At a House committee meeting earlier this month, the sponsor of SB 42, Sen. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 4:08 am
Liberty Mutual Insurance Europe Limited (LMIE) was recently granted authorization by Ecuadorian insurance regulator la Superintendencia de Bancos y Seguros (SBS) to do business in the country as a foreign reinsurer. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:11 am
What's more interesting are some provisions that will allow individuals to not have ignition interlock on at all. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 8:09 am
A reader alerts me to Missouri SB 714 which creates an entirely different retirement plan for any judge entering service on or after January 1, 2011. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 11:53 am
SB 780 would do the same thing. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 10:10 am
If you are interested in helping get this bill passed into law then you should contact your state senator here and let them know your story. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 11:10 am
Both HB 969 and SB 1734 resemble the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), though they contain some notable differences. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
The four factors ask a court to consider: (1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 11:29 am
If you're interested in financial incentives in particular check out this page and follow the link to the Database of State Incentives For Renewables and Efficiency. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:07 pm
Effective January 1, 2012, SB 337 became California Civil Code Section 1940.4. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:20 am
The law allows the courts to grant those time extensions in cases in which such an extension is in the interest of fairness, and the health of the plaintiff would not be endangered by the additional testimony time. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 3:55 am
The interests are deeply entrenched. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:30 am
Read EFF's letter to POST on SB 978 violations. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:53 pm
Redaction and/or withholding of records is permitted to protect specified privacy interests. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:45 am
SB 552 certainly would not have served the public interest. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:09 pm
This is where things would get really interesting. [read post]
