Search for: "In the Matter of: Kennedy" Results 321 - 340 of 5,579
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It is worth noting that our gathering occurred before the late-June blockbuster of the Court and, particularly with regard to Carol’s paper, its opinion in the Kennedy “praying coach” case. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Redding, Islamic Challenges to Pakistan’s Transgender Rights Law, (10 Melbourne Asia Review (2022)).William Wagner, Amicus Brief in Kennedy v Bremerton School District, (U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 12:23 pm by Anastasia Boden and Elizabeth Slattery
(Our colleague responded that what matters is the principle, not the technology available at any one time). [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  For pragmatists, what matters are the conclusions, not the metaphysics. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:15 am by Michael C. Dorf
So the boomerang potential is there no matter what. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 8:13 pm by David Oscar Markus
This includes Dobbs (abortion), NY Rifle (guns), Kennedy and Carson (religious liberty) and WV v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:07 am by Josh Blackman
Then again, the relevant passage from Lawrence--a classic Kennedy mystical aphorism--blends together equal protection and due process because dignity. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Adrian Vermeule, Common Good Constitutionalism (Polity Press 2022). [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
The events of the past month, including, most notably, the Dobbs case reversing Roe, has exposed the hollowness of the hope that what used to be called “reasoned elaboration” would, as somewhat pathetically asserted in the famous plurality opinion in Casey in by Justices O’Connor, Kennedy, and Souter, bring the national debate to an end because the Supreme Court, had, after all, issued its ukase. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:34 am by jonathanturley
” Simply as a factual matter, Nienaber insisted “I do not recall making such a statement. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:36 pm by Josh Blackman
For example, Justice Kennedy declined to overrule Washington v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Kennedy & Eugene Volokh, The New Taboo: Quoting Epithets in the Classroom and Beyond, 49 Cap. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:55 pm by Dennis Crouch
Mathilda and Terence Kennedy Inst. of Rheumatology Tr., 764 F.3d 1366, 1372 (Fed. [read post]