Search for: "In the Matter of Confidential Consumer Protection Investigation" Results 321 - 340 of 477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
“ECR” may stand for "Efficient Consumer Response", Birgit explains: will the relevant consumer know, so making the acronym descriptive? [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 2:30 pm by Guest Blogger
This insight was proven through extensive clinical investigation in the field. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:29 am by Heather S. Klein
  We encourage the Bureau to develop standards for protecting trade or confidential information when it publishes its responses. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/SX5SVYnUOV -> Is Pop… http://t.co/YBm69xrsrh -> Why I’m reporting AVG for violating CASL http://t.co/JE26lMN0BD -> Top 5 Insurance Industry Misconceptions About Copyright http://t.co/8mKat7gK3G -> Microsoft, Getty copyright dispute heads for mediation http://t.co/KzF55S9HBT -> Rudy Giuliani joins Activision legal fight against Manuel Noriega http://t.co/vWyeFx6ynd -> Nortel bankruptcy trial starts to wrap up in Toronto and Delaware http://t.co/6btWONawGl… [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
__________The Investor's Advocate: How the SEC Protects Investors, Maintains Market Integrity, and Facilitates Capital Formation,[4]Securities and Exchange CommissionUndated(some footnotes added and links omitted)IntroductionThe mission of the U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm by Beth Van Schaack
  The Trial Chamber issued the subpoena on the grounds that the protection against self-incrimination does not preclude the issuance of a subpoena in another case, even one proceeding before the same court. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:46 am by Adi Kamdar
  And this is why California law requires phone companies to protect their customers' unlisted or non-published phone numbers.1 The California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has opened up an investigation [pdf] to determine whether and to what extent Comcast may have broken the law in allowing this release of non-published numbers. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:16 am by BakerHostetler
Forsheit’s 17 years of litigation experience includes the handling of complex commercial and appellate matters for corporate clients in federal and state courts, including purported class actions under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act, representation of companies in litigation brought under privacy statutes such as California’s Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA), and disputes involving… [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:45 am
A consumer advocate, John Simpson of Consumer Watchdog, focused on privacy issues (video), which are also critical, but he didn’t explore certification.Google declined to comment for this article and the DMV told me the issue would be “addressed in the regulations when we release them … later this summer. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:41 pm
A consumer advocate, John Simpson of Consumer Watchdog, focused on privacy issues (video), which are also critical, but he didn’t explore certification.Google declined to comment for this article and the DMV told me the issue would be “addressed in the regulations when we release them … later this summer. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:44 am by admin
It also does not matter that the name has been registered for corporate purposes, is trade-marked or otherwise subject to intellectual property protection, etc. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm by Barry Sookman
It appears in a wide array of contexts ranging from anonymous surveys to the protection of police informant identities. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm by Barry Sookman
It appears in a wide array of contexts ranging from anonymous surveys to the protection of police informant identities. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:00 am by Brian Hall
In CVS/Caremark Corporation (CVS), an FTC investigation concluded that CVS had disposed of documents containing confidential customer and employee information in publicly accessible unsecured dumpsters used by CVS pharmacies in at least 15 cities throughout the United States. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:57 am by Brian Hall
 In CVS/Caremark Corporation (“CVS”), an FTC investigation concluded that CVS had disposed of documents containing confidential customer and employee information in publicly accessible unsecured dumpsters used by CVS pharmacies in at least 15 cities throughout the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
As a general matter, there is nothing unlawful about employers accessing publicly available information about job applicants or employees. [read post]