Search for: "In the Matter of Jackson" Results 321 - 340 of 5,166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
The event was moderated by Ralph Richard Banks, the Jackson Eli Reynolds Professor of Law and Faculty Director of the Stanford Center for Racial Justice, along with the following Stanford Law faculty panelists: Easha Anand, Assistant Professor and Co-Director of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic; Richard Thompson Ford, George E. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 1:57 am by Seán Binder
  DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS – TRUMP LEGAL MATTERS Lawyers for former President Trump on Monday asked Judge Aileen M. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Barry Winograd
In that case, the Court concluded that a stay pending an interlocutory appeal “is not a matter of right,” but is to be guided by district court reference to four traditional factors: (1) likelihood of success on the merits, (2) irreparable injury, (3) injury to other parties, and (4) the public interest. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
"  Exactly the sort of case, one would think, that federal courts must, as a constitutional matter, decline to hear, for the simple reason that it does not yet exist (and may never exist—see below). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:31 am by David Oscar Markus
’”             Justice Kagan, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson, dissented. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:42 am by Seán Binder
Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled yesterday that former President Trump can be deposed in the lawsuit brought by former FBI agent Peter Strzok against the Justice Department for his wrongful termination after the Russia investigation. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:00 am by Tiffany Scaramucci
Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a strongly worded dissent joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, in which she maintained that majority “cements a superficial rule of colorblindness as a constitutional principle in an endemically segregated society where race has always mattered and continues to matter. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:50 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Jackson Women’s Health Organization landmark abortion decision as a panelist for the “Emerging Impact of Dobbs on Employers, Employee Benefits and Healthcare” at the 2023 Fall Spring Meeting of the Society of Professional Benefit Administrators (“SPBA”) on September 13-14, 2023 at the Hilton Downtown Hotel in Nashville, Tennessee. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:24 pm by Joshua Lloyd
Egan, a partner in the Dallas office of Jackson Walker, LLP, draws on over 50 years of experience advising clients, helping to draft Texas entity statutes, and teaching legal education courses to create this treatise. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:31 am by Raymond Nhan and Mahmood Jeewa*
The Court also recognized that without a stay, the district court will waste judicial resources that could be devoted to other matters. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am by Minyao Wang
’” “Generic” phrases referring to what Congress may regulate as a constitutional matter, Alito wrote, do not rebut the presumption against extraterritoriality.. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:24 am by Marcia Coyle
No, responded Sotomayor, who was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan—esp. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 5:26 am by Michael C. Dorf
To give up this would be to give up liberty, to give up progress, and to consign the nation to moral stagnation, putrefaction, and death.In the matter of respect for dignitaries, it should never be forgotten, however, that duties are reciprocal, and while the people should frown down every manifestation of levity and contempt for those in power, it is the duty of the possessors of power so to use it as to deserve and to insure respect and reverence.To come a little nearer to the case now… [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:35 pm by Josh Blackman
As a general matter, the plaintiff gets to decide where to sue a defendant. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am by Gene Takagi
In so holding, the Court cements a superficial rule of colorblindness as a constitutional principle in an endemically segregated society where race has always mattered and continues to matter. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 1:13 pm by Christopher McKinney
In Masterpiece Cakeshop, the Court primarily focused on the bakery owner's religious objections but deliberately avoided ruling on the matter of free speech. [read post]