Search for: "In the Matter of the Parenting and Support of: G." Results 321 - 340 of 708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2013, 9:07 am by Laura Orr
SECTION 4.Sections 1 to 3 of this 2013 Act apply to foster children in substitute care with a foster parent, a child-caring agency or an independent residence facility on or after the effective date of this 2013 Act. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The State Commissioner's verified answer, however, dwells on CPLR 7803(4), asserts that there was substantial evidence on the record to support his decision and requests transfer of the proceeding to the Appellate Division pursuant to CPLR 7804(g). [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The State Commissioner's verified answer, however, dwells on CPLR 7803(4), asserts that there was substantial evidence on the record to support his decision and requests transfer of the proceeding to the Appellate Division pursuant to CPLR 7804(g). [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:35 pm by Jim Gerl
Here is an analysis by CADRE of Resolution Meetings- State Supports and Practices. [read post]
4 May 2012, 1:24 pm by Jim Gerl
Here is an analysis by CADRE of Resolution Meetings- State Supports and Practices. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 8:18 am by Joel R. Brandes
 In considering Pierpont’s Motion, there was evidence in the record that supported Pierpont and some evidence that supported Singh. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:22 pm by William S. Koski
School officials should be aware of and comply with the laws of their jurisdictions, as a general matter. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 3:14 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Second, defendants F, G, H, I, J and K established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the fifth and seventh causes of action on the ground of judicial immunity. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 6:09 pm by Family Law Attorneys
"If Mother fails to return to Tennessee [after summer vacation] with the children following her visitation period, she could lose her alimony, child support and education fund, which is added assurance to Father that she is going to return with the children," Circuit Court Judge James G. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 10:36 pm by Stephen Page
To read thethreeparagraphs is instructive, and supportive of our conclusion. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:36 am by Marty Lederman
 Here is the extraordinary hypothetical analogy that the majority offers to demonstrate its point:[G]iven that this is the Matthew Shepard Act, imagine that a child tells his parents he is gay. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
In addition, I write to express my position on one preliminary matter addressed by the majority. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
If the claims cover subject matter that was added in the CIP case, then the claim of priority to the parent cases is not necessary and actually can limit the number of other continuing applications that may be filed off that parent case. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:30 pm by Guido Paola
Turning now to whether the Examining Division dealing with the Divisional application considered the minutes in case T 1712/15 as being a decision: the wording in Form 1703 does not support this. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Rule 14 EPC 1973 can prevent, as lex specialis, other acts, e.g., as in J 20/05, the filing of a divisional application (see also G 1/09 [3.2.5], and J 9/12 [3,5]). [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Akeem petitioned for a re-hearing that was supported by an amicus brief from the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association (ITLA). [read post]