Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: S. A. C., Child." Results 321 - 340 of 443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2011, 1:07 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Recognized in Who’s Who In American Professionals and both an American Bar Association (ABA) and a State Bar of Texas Fellow, Ms. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:10 am by Marta Requejo
 BERGÉ, J–S.: “El Derecho europeo ante la fragmentación del Derecho aplicable a las relaciones internacionales: la mirada del internacional–privatista”, pp. 49–68. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:28 am by PaulKostro
That requirement stems from the deep-rooted but sometimes conflicting principles that “`parents have a constitutionally-protected, fundamental liberty interest in raising their biological children, even if those children have been placed in foster care[,]‘” and that “`the State’s parens patriae responsibility to protect the welfare of children . . . is limited to situations in which the state has demonstrated that the childs… [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:02 am by familoo
In each case section 1 of the Children Act 1989, enacted by Parliament, requires the welfare of the child to be paramount; that is more important than anything else. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by WSLL
  Issues continued to prevail, however,concerning Mother’s compliance with the orders of the juvenile court andconcerning the welfare of the children. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 4:35 am
The plan provides a roadmap for the childs future, and is the most important document in a Florida divorce with children. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
  (3) Subject to the provisions of clauses (a), (c) and (i) of sub-section (1), any information relating to any occurrence, event or matter which has taken place, occurred or happened twenty years before the date on which any request is made under secton 6 shall be provided to any person making a request under that section: Provided that where any question arises as to the date from which the said period of twenty years has to be computed, the decision of the Central… [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:26 pm by familoo
You may not have read it because, unusually for a report which purports to be signally important in the development of government policy on matters of such public interest and importance as the permanent severing of the child : parent relationship, it is behind a paywall and (C) News International Trading Limited and hailed as an “exclusive”. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by PaulKostro
When a case concerns visitation and not custody, the court has recognized that “‘the matter of visitation is so important, especially during the formative years of a child, that if a plenary hearing will better enable a court to fashion a plan of visitation more commensurate with a childs welfare,’ a plenary hearing must be required by the court even if the parties have waived it. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:23 pm by Eliana Baer
As a result, the Court reversed the trial court’s decision and remanded the matter back to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the Appellate Division’s opinion. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am by Joel R. Brandes
The order of disposition was reversed on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the fact-finding order was vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court for a new fact-finding hearing. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am by Matthew Flinn
Read as a whole, Munby LJ said that the guidance to Crown Prosecutors required them to take into account the interests and welfare of the Defendant, the interests and welfare of the victim(s), the impact of a prosecution on the mental, physical and emotional health of the victim, the views of the victim or the victim’s family on these matters, and the views of social services. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am by The Legal Blog
Simply because a foreign court has taken a particular view on any aspect concerning the welfare of the minor is not enough for the courts in this country to shut out an independent consideration of the matter. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:05 am by PaulKostro
Parental rights are constitutionally protected, and the Division’s right to intervene is based on “the State’s parens patriae responsibility to protect the welfare of children. [read post]