Search for: "Interest of Th"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
Kluwer Patent BlogTo ensure you don’t miss out on interesting IP law developments reported on our other IP blogs, we will, on a regular basis, provide you with an overview of the top 3 most-read posts from each of our IP law blogs. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 1:40 am
Louise Thorning AhleRecently, the Danish Commercial and Maritime High Court balanced the legal interest in the family name Ørsted against the commercial interest in the name of Ørsted by ruling on the right to register and use several trademarks and domains including or consisting of ØRSTED. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
Théberge spent a lot of time pointing out that, as of April 1, 2019 the new “public interest” requirement for tariffs came into effect. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:07 pm
Employment Announcements (More details on the Job Board) The following are job announcements of potential interest to Lawfare readers. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:05 pm
Today’s unremarkable and unanimous opinion suggests that the justices similarly have lost interest. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 12:47 pm
The interesting question is whether that remains true. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:40 am
As of today, Banco del Tesoro has not been designated as an entity whose property and interest in property are blocked, thus, it is not subject to US sanctions. [read post]
29 May 2019, 8:19 am
… [However,] SB-753 proposes to amend the definition of “sell” in Civil Code Section 1798.140 in a manner that will break down th[is] silo effect. [read post]
26 May 2019, 8:22 pm
For today’s remarks I am interested in thinking a little about the fundamental contradiction of Cuban socialism in Cuba’s “New Era. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:45 am
Interesting enough, the same Court of Turin, while dealing with the alleged “artistic” value of the scooter VESPA, took an entirely different position (see in here). [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:19 am
The Court ruled that the patent itself did not distinguish between IPv4 and IPv6, but only referred to th Internet Protocol (IP). [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:21 am
It would be interesting to see if the plaintiff appeals this decision before the Supreme Court of India. *********** [1] Tea Board, India v ITC Limited, (C.S. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:56 am
The aim is to remodel industrial property laws to comply with recent judgments of the EU Court and legislation, as well as more effectively balance the interests of stakeholders in the Polish market. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:43 pm
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:55 am
Some interesting key points from the decision are that the PMÖD felt compelled to change the Swedish practice on black and white marks in this case. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:00 pm
Claim 1 of the appellant's fifth auxiliary request differs from the main request by the addition of the following at the end of the claim:"based both on geographic criteria which define areas of responsibility and areas of interest and on attributes of the data itself. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 11:13 pm
Such clarification might also be in the plaintiff’s interest, because he can be obliged to pay damages to the defendant if a court lifts an interim injunction later, or when a warning letter was unjustified. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:50 am
This has set an interesting precedent for adidas to seek further limitations on the use of four- and two-stripe designs in sports and casual footwear. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:37 am
Indeed, it seems that despite what the CJEU said, there is an inherent inconsistency between the principle of legitimate expectations (which is a private interest) and that of legal certainty (which is a public interest and requires that similar situations should all be dealt in the same way). [read post]
