Search for: "Ives v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 7,553
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
§ 355(j)(2)(A)(v). [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 10:52 am
[iv] In 2010, following the financial crisis and recession, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 10:00 am
Section IV. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 8:07 am
In the case of nanomaterials not listed in Annexes IV, V, and VI, notifications must include additional data on the safety of the nanomaterial for use in cosmetic products. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:10 am
Augustine School v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:32 am
V. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 3:40 am
In two previous blogs, here and here , we have discussed the United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 10:01 am
The five categories of protected characteristics remain as those stated in the Interim Report, namely: (i) age, (ii) nationality, (iii) sex, marital status, pregnancy status, caregiving responsibilities, (iv) race, religion, language, and (v) disability and mental health conditions. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:39 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Case No. 6:23-cv-59-JDK (TMA IV). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This is Volume IV of the major questions doctrine (“MQD”) reading list. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 10:18 am
Read Part I for a quick snapshot of the ins and outs of the zero draft; Part II for a deep dive on Chapter IV dealing with domestic surveillance powers; and Part III for a deep dive on Chapter V regarding international cooperation: the historical context of international police cooperation mechanisms, the zero draft's approach, the scope of cooperation, and protection of personal data. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 1:34 pm
New Jersey companies utilizing the services of temporary workers contracted through a staffing agency or temporary help service firm should be aware that additional state-mandated protections covering certain temporary workers took effect on Saturday, August 5, 2023. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
Following the case of Giles v Rhind (No 2) [2008] EWCA Civ 118 (“Giles v Rhind”), Mr Justice Jay found that s 32(2) LA 1980 should be interpreted more widely, so as to cover “legal wrongdoing of any kind, giving rise to a right of action”. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
This is the third segment in EFF’s series on the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention focusing on Chapter V, International Cooperation. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
Member States aim for total consensus on the draft convention's text. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:37 am
Williams v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In Saarinen v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In Saarinen v. [read post]