Search for: "J. Scalia" Results 321 - 340 of 1,610
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
” President Donald J. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:31 pm by Josh Blackman
Britton, 523 U.S. 574, 611–12 (1998) (Scalia, J., joined by Thomas, J., dissenting). [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:00 pm
To look back on my exchange with Stevens is a reminder of how firmly conspiracy thinking has taken hold in America, from anti-vaxxer propaganda to the belief that the moon landing was faked....The Bible of the Oxfordian movement was J. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Mueller testified that President Donald J. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:23 am by Vishnu Kannan
.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) will hold an event titled, “Homeland Defense and the Role of NORAD and USNORTHCOM: A Conversation with General Terrence J. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:35 am
But a year into his confirmation, Judge Mark J. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
Aniskoff, 507 U.S. 511, 519 (1993) (Scalia, J., concurring in the judgment) ("The legislative history of [this] Act contains a variety of diverse personages, a selected few of whom—its 'friends'—the Court has introduced to us in support of its result. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
., its unadorned textual meaning—and one should not underrate the importance to Lessig, who was, after all, a law clerk for Antonin Scalia, of text and textual fidelity—prior to engaging in certain second-order hermeneutic movements away from pilpul and toward a more sophisticated “translation” that is sensitive to context. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:44 pm by Sasha Volokh
S. 50, 69 (2011) (Scalia, J., concurring) (principally relying on Manning, supra). [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am by Eric Goldman
  527 U.S. at 658 n.9 (Stevens, J., joined by Souter, Ginsburg & Breyer, JJ., dissenting). [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 7:44 am by Eugene Volokh
., 481 U.S. 787, 816 n.2 (1987) (Scalia, J., concurring in the judgment), no history exists of any congressional prosecution of federal crimes. [read post]