Search for: "JACK v. STATE" Results 321 - 340 of 2,977
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2018, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
The Task Force has already seen results, facilitating voluntary local reforms, and it takes on even greater importance in the wake of the Wayfair v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:18 pm
SUSAN COMBS, SUCCESSOR TO CAROLE KEETON STRAYHORN, COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, AND GREG ABBOTT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-07-00006-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-12-08)08-0327 WOODROW WILSON WILLIAMS v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 4:25 pm by Howard Bashman
” And Jack Rodgers of Courthouse News Service reports that “State’s Bid to Skirt Drug-Pricing Preemption Put to High Court Test. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by Haim Abraham
From 1812 through the mid-20th century, the state immunity doctrine was interpreted in accordance with the Supreme Court case Schooner Exchange v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:34 pm by Orin Kerr
” It seems difficult to me to square that conclusion with the Second Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 11:00 am by Karen Tani
Mayer, which held that private acts of race discrimination in housing were prohibited by the Civil Rights Act; and United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:32 am
Mayer, which held that private acts of race discrimination in housing were prohibited by the Civil Rights Act; and United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) has been allowed. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
On Monday and Tuesday 27 and 28 February 2017, Warby J will hear the much anticipated trial in the case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 11:10 am
In this (long) post, and in this article, Professor Jack Balkin proposes and fleshes out the argument that we should think in terms of two abortion rights, not one:The first right to abortion is a woman's right not to be forced by the state to bear children at risk to her life or health. [read post]