Search for: "JOHN DOES 1 - 42" Results 321 - 340 of 863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2013, 10:18 pm
” Luke, who is so precise with names, does not identify the woman who anointed Jesus with oil while he was still alive and in Galilee -- but in the very next sentences (beginning with "Some time afterward") he does identify Mary Magdalene by name, and mentions that Jesus drove from her "seven demons." [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:54 am by Robert Chesney
  As you’ll see below, it does present some formatting headaches, so please forgive that. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:08 pm by Cicely Wilson
Does 1-1058, USDC (5/27/14)Civil Procedure, Copyright, Intellectual Property, Internet Law, Legal EthicsAF Holdings, represented by Prenda Law, filed suit in district court against 1,058 unnamed John Does who it alleged had illegally downloaded and shared the pornographic film “Popular Demand” using a file-sharing service known as BitTorrent. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted and held cases. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:13 am by admin
  Writing is contemporaneous; it is permanent; it does not misremember. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
John Elwood finally reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:26 am by John Johnson
Of these private well-users, 81% had tested their drinking water—compared to 42% of those serviced by public utilities. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
There is, absolutely, no empirical proof of that connection, and previous action by the LSO has already demonstrated that this approach does not work. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 11:32 pm by SOIssues
Total revenues in 2008 were $42 million. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
Ct.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Presbyterian Lay CommitteeAmicus brief of Becket Fund for Religious LibertyReply of petitioners Student Doe 1 v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents (1971) and 42 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents (1971) and 42 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am by Kedar Bhatia
Nassar 12-484Issue: Whether the retaliation provision of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. [read post]