Search for: "JORDAN v. C " Results 321 - 340 of 552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2012, 9:44 am by Gmlevine
” Although trademark owners do not lose their statutory priority over respondents registering lapsed domain names, FBomb Clothing c/o Joel Jordan v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 6:23 am by Robichaud
  Under section 8(1)(c), the Act makes it a criminal offence for youth to possess more than 5 grams, compared to the adult threshold of 30g. [read post]
2 May 2018, 6:23 am by Robichaud
  Under section 8(1)(c), the Act makes it a criminal offence for youth to possess more than 5 grams, compared to the adult threshold of 30g. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:34 am by gmlevine
Network Technologies Polska Jasinski Lutoborski Sp.J., D2009-0785 (WIPO August 5, 2009 ) and registrants who acquire inadvertently lapsed domain names with significant page views (Red Nacional; FBomb Clothing c/o Joel Jordan v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm by Aurora Barnes
§ 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:10 pm by Jeff Gamso
C-110382, 2012-Ohio-1366.That's from the prosecutor's memorandum urging the Supreme Court of Ohio to hear its appeal in State v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:02 am by Annette Burns
’”   The Supreme Court decision then cited to Jordan v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:02 am by Annette Burns
’”   The Supreme Court decision then cited to Jordan v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:45 am by Jay Willis
Jordan Weissman at the National Law Journal previews the “little-noticed” case of Robertson v. [read post]