Search for: "Jack Balkin"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,510
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2020, 7:46 am
Jack M. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 6:22 am
Here is the abstract: Jack Balkin’s Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World and Sandy Levinson’s Constitutional Faith understand the problem of constitutional evil quite differently than Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge Studies on the American Constitution) . [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 2:26 pm
As readers of this blog know, Jack Balkin has been developing a theory of “information fiduciaries” for the past five years or so. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 5:19 am
Jack Balkin at Balkinization refers us to a proposal recently submitted to "the Vice President, the Attorney General, and the chairs of the House and Senate Judiciary committees:" §1. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 5:50 pm
In my case, that would be (Jack /2 Balkin). [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
(cross-posted at Balkinization) The discussion between David Strauss and myself about whether originalism is a good idea for liberals has by now gone well beyond the narrow question of originalism itself and moved on to far deeper topics-- rhetoric, faith, and legitimacy. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 9:46 am
I hope Alex can therefore be persuaded to weigh in on this post by Jack Balkin asking which rock stars the Court resembles most. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 1:10 pm
I am deeply grateful to Jack Balkin and the other regular Balkinization bloggers for this opportunity. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:29 am
Meyler Douglas NeJaime Alexander Tsesis Emily Zackin We are thrilled to have Jack Balkin aboard to participate in the discussion of his terrific book. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 2:05 am
.-- Jack M. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:26 am
I’m listening to Jack Balkin (of Balkinization) give a talk, whilst sitting next to one of my very favorite law prof bloggers, Michael Froomkin (of Discourse.net), and next to him is Brad DeLong (of Grasping Reality with Both Hands: The Semi-Daily Journal Economist Brad DeLong). [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 12:18 pm
Here is the abstract:Yale law professor Jack Balkin has recently argued in three forthcoming law review articles that originalism and living constitutionalism are compatible contrary to the claims of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 9:07 pm
Jack Balkin returns to the issue of originalism and why progressives should embrace it: Doug Kendall and Jim Ryan's essay in the New Republic makes the eminently sensible point that progressives should stop viewing originalism as the enemy just because they have come to associate it with people they disagree with politically. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:40 pm
(Randy Barnett) You really must check out the new articles and abstracts posted on today’s Legal Theory Blog by Laura Rosenbury, Larry Alexander, Akhil Amar, Jack Balkin, and Ted Eisenberg and Michael Heise. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
I'm participating at a Yale Law School conference on Constitutional Interpretation on Jack Balkin's book "Living Originalism. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:16 am
Check This Out by Brian Tamanaha A Note on Originalism and Judicial Practice by Jack Balkin A Possibly Foolish Question on Larry Solum on Semantic Originalism by Paul GowderMy original post was: Semantic and Normative Originalism: Comments on Brian Leiter's "Justifying Originalism". [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 5:20 pm
Available online at SSRN: Law Professor Jack M. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 3:00 pm
This past month I did two podcasts on Meet Me in the Middle, hosted by Bill Curtis.The first podcast is on my new book, The Cycles of Constitutional Time and our current problems of constitutional rot.https://www.curtco.com/mmitm-53-jack-balkinThe second podcast is on social media, and the right way to regulate (and not regulate) them.https://www.curtco.com/mmitm-54-jack-balkin-returns [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:56 am
Balkinization is on the list of ten finalists for best law blog in the 2007 Weblog Awards. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:15 pm
Jack Balkin makes a variety of more complex arguments, but also commits the abstract meaning fallacy. [read post]
