Search for: "Jacobs v. Major"
Results 321 - 340
of 635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2010, 8:08 am
In National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 7:58 am
" Abrams v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 4:03 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 3:46 am
” Prosecutorial Accountability questions “some claims made by Oregon and Louisiana” in Ramos v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm
To those legal analysts who have questioned how Kennedy can square his apparent views on the First Amendment right of public employees to not face compulsory fees with his majority opinion in Garcetti v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:02 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Jacob J. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
This week saw the ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd and others [2007] EWCA Civ 501, a decision of Lords Justices Keene, Jacob and Toulson on Thursday 24 May 2007.Musical megastar Jimi Hendrix (left), a US citizen, gave performances between 1967 and his death in 1970 in (among other places) the UK, Sweden and the USA. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
Fortunately this particular matter has been considered and largely rejected by the UK courts (see Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd [2001] EWHC/Ch/25 ) As mentioned, there is quite a bit of case law on the public interest issue, and those interested in it may find it helpful to read a summary by Jacob J(as he then was) in his first instance hearing of Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland case (see paras [24-34]). [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:46 am
The right to information and the list of major events regime“, Katrien Lefever, Hannes Cannie & Peggy Valcke, E.H.R.L.R. (2010) No.4 pgs.396-407. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
Jacob Dean (b) Which case involved the Olympics and Lord Coe? [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
[For a summary of the many studies in this area, see the Scholars' Amicus Brief in Vasquez v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
[For a summary of the many studies in this area, see the Scholars' Amicus Brief in Vasquez v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm
Shane, Jacob E. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 6:31 pm
The CA v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 11:44 am
Judge Jacobs disagreed. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Further, these problems can have major impacts – financial, physical, mental, and social. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 4:06 am
Mermeren v Fox ISir Robin Jacob calls for System 2 thinking for patent law I Florence court prohibits unauthorized commercial use of David's image I Thursday Thingies [Week ending 3 December] Clash of the beer pongs - Breakthrough Funding Ltd v Nearby Media Ltd I WTO establishes panel to examine Qatar’s complaint against UAE I What's next for trade marks in the UK and EU? [read post]
6 May 2007, 2:03 pm
RAC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
So strong was his condemnation of the proposals, that he declared that he "would seriously consider to decline to take part in this system as it stands", saying also that he spoke for the majority of his first instance colleagues. [read post]
