Search for: "January v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 21,800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2012, 11:36 pm by Record on Appeal
On January 24, 2012, the Hawaii Supreme Court accepted cert in Charles Mitchell Hart and Lisa Marie Hart v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On 19 January 2016, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:24 am by sally
” WLR Daily, 21st January 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
Being on the State or a participating employer’s payroll determines eligibility for member service credit in the State's Employees' Retirement SystemMatter of Muccia v DiNapoli, 2010 NY Slip Op 00630, Decided and Entered: January 28, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentMargaret M. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
According to the case docket, Brown entered a not guilty plea on January 30, 2013. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:16 am
Argued January 18, 2017—Decided June 19, 2017. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 10:16 am by Christine Corcos
Argued January 18, 2017—Decided June 19, 2017. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:55 am by tracey
MM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: [2012] EWCA Civ 135;  [2012] WLR (D)  36 ” ‘Conspicuous unfairness’ was not a free standing ground in an immigration case on which a court could act in the absence of unlawful action on the part of the Home Secretary.” WLR Daily, 24th January 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:06 am by Ambassador P. Michael McKinley (ret.)
On January 6, 2021, supporters of former President Donald Trump attacked the U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
[See the Board's February 2008 decision (TTABlogged here), sustaining Nextel's opposition to Motorola's application to register a 911 Hz chirp on the ground that it failed to function as a trademark.]January 14, 2009 - 10 AM: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]