Search for: "Jenkins v. Jenkins" Results 321 - 340 of 1,027
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2010, 2:06 pm
According to the City of New York, the vendor’s failure to report Jenkins Act information to the State of New York prevented the City from acquiring the information it needed to collect “tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars a year” in tobacco tax revenue from City residents who had failed to pay the tax.Proximate CauseIn Holmes v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 3:33 am by Katherine Gundersen
However, the Jenkins case was determined on the basis of other exemptions and, in any case, the Tribunal said that the issue was not free from doubt.The Jenkins case was approved of in DBERR v ICO and FoE (EA/2007/0072), but DBERR did not rely on section 12 and and the Tribunal heard no submissions on it. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 11:25 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Sherman Jenkins, No. 118,120 (Shawnee)Direct appeal; First-degree felony murderKorey A. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:25 am
Judge Richard HaconIn the Florence Foster Jenkins decision, as discussed here, Hacon J gave a useful summary of UK copyright law on the issue of joint authorship. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 5:18 am by Narendra Ghosh
Jenkins Cleaner, addresses the “going and coming” rule. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:51 am
Jenkins discussion and the entirety of Part III.) [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 6:44 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 104708 (WD KY, July 25, 2013), a Kentucky federal district court dismissed a death row inmate's complaint about the denial of a pastoral visit to him.In Jenkins v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:38 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crawford & Anor v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 (17 February 2012) Oxford City Council v Basey [2012] EWCA Civ 115 (15 February 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) AB & Anor v Home Office [2012] EWHC 226 (QB) (16 February 2012) Gold & Anor v Cox & Anor [2012] EWHC 272 (QB) (17 February 2012) Independent Police Complaints Commission v Warner & Ors… [read post]