Search for: "John Doe, I"
Results 321 - 340
of 23,935
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:48 am
” “We should wipe the decision off the books,” Alito concluded, “and because the Court refuses to do so, I must respectfully dissent. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:55 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17 (1966). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
This bill does no more. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
"I like this quote from 1599: "God first made Angels bodilesse pure minds, Then other things, which mindlesse bodies bee" (from Nosce Teipsum, by John Davies).I like "mindlesse bodies bee. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
When I use the word "modality" in this post, I am simply referring to the general concept that includes both necessity and possibility in all their forms. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 8:27 am
The virtual consciousness does not ask permission to think, though it may be unable to actualize its determinations. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
Man: My offenses are no longer crimes of violence, so I'm due for some new sentences. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:53 am
Refusal seems as inevitable as a Caitlin Clark three-pointer Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:54 am
As for technical aspects, Strich said that she does not edit episodes and that glitches have been minor. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:32 am
Carey & I. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:39 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 8:07 pm
(Example: where Company A wants to sponsor John Doe; and Company B also wants to sponsor John Doe. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 8:03 pm
Harbaugh almost never does, not intentionally. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Although he made a strong argument, I share the widespread view among observers that the Supreme Court will reverse the Colorado Supreme Court and allow Trump’s name to appear on the ballot.The Dog that Probably Won’t BarkOne rationale on which the Supreme Court probably will not rely is the claim by Trump’s lawyers (and a few scholars) that Trump is not barred from the Presidency because Section 3’s ineligibility provision does not apply to the Presidency. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
” Perhaps that’s a daunting consequence, but it’s one we already have, regardless of what the Court does. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:47 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
– John Jenkins [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 6:56 pm
To that end I consider three distinct but related points. [read post]
