Search for: "John Doe A,B,C and D" Results 321 - 340 of 1,363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 2:42 pm by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
The Bar next argues that the same conduct that violated rules 4-8.4(b) and (c) also violated rule 4-8.4(d). [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 11:03 am by Benjamin Wittes
The administration has claimed the authority to target Americans only where (a) the target is a senior operational leader of Al Qaeda or associated forces, (b) he poses an imminent threat, (c) his capture is not feasible, and (d) targeting would be consistent with the laws of war. [read post]
11 May 2021, 10:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Amplified by platforms that like this content b/c controversy drives attention. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 10:50 am by John B. Palley
Sec. 7001 et seq.), but does not modify, limit, or supersede Section 101(c) of that act (15 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am by John Elwood
John Elwood briefly reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:07 am by John Palley
L. 107-16, title V, Sec. 532(c)(15), (d), title IX,     Sec. 901, June 7, 2001, 115 Stat. 75, 150, temporarily struck out     item 2604 “Credit for certain State taxes”. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
Deliberate indifference to a known risk that a patent exists does not satisfy the knowledge required by §271(b). [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Many factors, including inability to leave Berne b/c of other agreements, serve to lock in the existing system. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am by John L. Welch
” Once it is determined that the mark does fall with the Section 2(b) prohibition, then the goods or services identified in the application to register are irrelevant. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
Indeed, does it make sense to look to the Constitution, written so many years ago, for contemporary guidance or limits on the sorts of arrangements Congress can make? [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:49 pm by Jennifer Chacon
Under this interpretation, CAT claims are limited by the bars on factual review set forth in Sections 1252(a)(2)(C) and(D). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm by Michael Lowe
  It states as follows: Part B (Zero-Point Offenders) Subpart 1 (Adjustment for Certain Zero-Point Offenders) Chapter Four is amended by inserting at the end the following new Part C: PART C ― ADJUSTMENT FOR CERTAIN ZERO-POINT OFFENDERS 4C1.1. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:02 am by John L. Welch
The Board observed that Section 2(c) and 2(d) contain express exceptions like that which Applicant proposes. [read post]