Search for: "John Doe Inc 1-2" Results 321 - 340 of 2,464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2015, 3:28 am
" A consent is required only if the individual bearing the name in the mark will be associated with the mark as used on the goods or services, either because: (1) the person is so well known that the public would reasonably assume a connection between the person and the goods or services; or (2) the individual is publicly connected with the business in which the mark is used.For purposes of this section, a "name" does not have to be a full name, but may be… [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 7:00 am
" The Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register, finding the mark merely descriptive of the goods. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
If the case does not settle, the court is likely to grapple with the issue of valuation of the damaged pieces. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 10:10 pm
In re Alphacritters, Inc., Serial No. 76573434 (July 27, 2009) [not precedential].Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:22 am by John L. Welch
So the chances of a refusal being affirmed are probably higher than 2 to 1.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
City of Norfolk (by a 2-1 vote), reaching the opposite result from Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 11:58 pm
[Part 2 of this two-part posting will appear tomorrow.]Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 3:39 am by John L. Welch
The PTO refused registration on the ground of mere descriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Stephan Hashemi, her son, instituted an action for damages on behalf of himself and his mother’s estate against (1) the Islamic Republic of Iran, (2) Iran’s head of state, the Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei, (3) Saeed Mortazavi, the Chief Public Prosecutor of Tehran, and (4) Mohammad Bakhshi, the former Deputy Chief of Intelligence of … [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The order is below.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------VICTOR P ALAGUACHI, DANIEL GALDAME, and MARCO MOROCHO, on behalf ofthemselves and other employees similarly situated, Plaintiffs, -against-ALL CITY REMODELING, INC., T &G CONTRACTING INC., GEORGE TSIMOYIANIS, and JOHN DOES 1-100, the actual names ofsuch individuals or entities being unknown, Defendants. [read post]