Search for: "John Doe v. Jane Doe" Results 321 - 340 of 460
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2012, 10:23 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Directed by Rob Reiner and featuring an all-star cast that includes Kevin Bacon, George Clooney, Jamie Lee Curtis, Christine Lahti, Jane Lynch, Brad Pitt, Martin Sheen and John C. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Mapping Russian Twitter, by John Kelly, Vladimir Barash, Karina Alexanyan, Bruce Etling, Robert Faris, Urs Gasser, and John Palfrey. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:46 am by Kenan Farrell
McKenna of Woodhard, Emhardt, Moriarity, McNett & Henry, LLP Defendant:     Shannon Bartnick, Chris Bartnick, John and Jane Does 1-15 Cause:    Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Trademark Deceptive Consumer Sales Activities under Ind. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:22 pm
 That is why the pro-life movement has made such a big deal out of the apparent conversion of Norma McCorvey--the Jane Roe of Roe v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:45 am by John J. Sullivan
”  Now, sometimes there’s a John or a Jane Doe, but we know that those are there as placeholders until the actual party is identified and then named.This leads us to the recent decision in Doe v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:39 pm by admin
…” (emphasis added) In other words, it could be defamatory to say “John took the money belonging to Jane”, as much as if you had said “John committed theft under s. 322 of the Criminal Code. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:46 am by Susan Brenner
It’s a matter of common sense and fairness.If hearsay weren’t excluded, John Doe could take the stand and say Jane Doe told him the defendant – Richard Roe – who’s on trial for murder confessed to the whole thing. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
” Swan Turton has a report here, as does PA Media Lawyer (subscription required). [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
  In court proceedings, the names John Doe or Jane Doe -- or John or Jane Roe --  are used as legal placeholders (scroll down) for various reasons. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Jane Fae, a specialist in the Obscene Publications Act, comments on the case here. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 2:58 pm by Sonia McNeil
” Al Janko’s now-dismissed suit asserted constitutional, statutory, and state tort law claims arising out of alleged mistreatment during his detention at Guantanamo against the United States, 20 civilian and military officials, and 100 John and Jane Does. [read post]