Search for: "John Does 1 And 2" Results 321 - 340 of 10,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Also: you get around §230, which is useful when you’re suing Twitter since the John Does don’t have any money. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
The fact that Oberding's sample matched that of the John Doe sample from the bakery robbery did not render his consent involuntary. . . . [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
"The Board therefore affirmed the Section 2(e)(2) refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 4:14 am
Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:03 pm by Kara OBrien
We are pleased to announced that John Villa of Williams & Connolly is the latest to sign on as a Contributor to the Securities Law Practice Center. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:42 am
It found the mark merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1), and likely to cause confusion with the registered mark THE BLOB for goods legally identical to applicant's goods. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:19 am by John L. Welch
My understanding is that a genericness refusal is just that, while a mere descriptiveness refusal falls under 2(e)(1), the failure under 2(f) merely meaning that the 2(e)(1) refusal has not been overcome.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 5:29 pm
The discussion September 2 focused on one of the House Bills, HR3200.This is Part 1 of 2 Parts. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm by Quinta Jurecic
He says that Doe’s argument allows the government only three options: (1) keep Doe in U.S. custody and allow him to litigate his habeas claim; (2) transfer Doe, but only after full habeas review; (3) free Doe immediately. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 7:32 am
In re Inovalon, Inc., Serial No. 85351975 [Section 2(e)(1) deceptive misdescriptiveness refusal of  .The test for deceptive misdescriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1) has two parts: (1) the mark must misdescribe the goods or services, and (2) consumers must believe the misdescription. [read post]