Search for: "Johnson v. Department of Corrections" Results 321 - 340 of 450
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
In granting the injunction, she simply indicated that the Justice Department was likely, but not certain, to prevail on those points at a later trial in federal court. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm by Howard Friedman
Kentucky Department of Corrections, 2010 U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Network challenge costs less than NAD; she recommends building into budget funds for NAD and network challenges, and allocation beforehand of cost between legal and marketing departments. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
”  [via LexisOne] Week of May 16,  2010: In Favor of the Prosecution or Warden  (initial list) Donnie Johnson v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The EPA and health department had sued the companies, claiming the slag-dumping process at the mill violates the federal Clean Air Act. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Department of Interior, 538 U.S. 803 (2003). [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
Wilkinson, Youngstown News, March 31, 2010 A&L Salvage Landfill has agreed to more than a $4 million settlement with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency to correct long-standing problems at its closed landfill. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:58 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Attorney General indicated that the Department of Justice would not defend the constitutionality of the law or enforce it.(2) The final judgment entered in that case declaring the law unconstitutional applies only to a limited number of attorneys. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:50 pm by Howard Friedman
Michigan Department of Corrections, 2010 U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:00 am by B.W. Barnett
Yesterday the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals released it opinion in Tolbert v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 12:30 pm by Howard Friedman
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, 2010 U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 5:45 pm by Anna Christensen
” Second, the United States argues that the fourth Olano prong for “instructional errors,” as interpreted in Johnson (1997), and United States v. [read post]