Search for: "Justice v. Justice" Results 321 - 340 of 88,311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2021, 10:13 am by Tom Smith
Four dissenting Supreme Court Justices warned last year that the majority’s decision in McGirt v. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 9:38 am by Amy Howe
” In the wake of the May 2022 leak of the draft opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 7:03 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  In addition to all of his other accomplishments, he’s an Army Reserve colonel and has served on the Army Court of Criminal Appeals, where he authored, among other opinions, United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Senator Cruz has remarked about an informal unwritten convention in American politics that a sitting but "lame duck" President does not get to have his SCOTUS nomination confirmed.In the 20th Century alone, there were six justices appointed and confirmed during a sitting president's last year in office before an election: Justice Anthony Kennedy in 1986; Michigan's Justice Frank Murphy in 1940; Justice Benjamin Cardozo in 1932;… [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 12:25 am by Will Baude
  But one interesting point I haven't seen noted has been what appears to be a slight revision in his view of Arizona v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:02 am by tracey
Regina (Rudewicz) v Secretary of State for Justice (Save Fawley Court Committee and others, interested parties) [2012] EWCA Civ 499;  [2012] WLR (D)  121 “It was for the Secretary of State of Justice, as the licensing authority for the exhumation of human remains (other than the power of a consistory court to grant a faculty to exhume human remains interred in consecrated ground of the Anglican Church), to determine on what grounds and in… [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 10:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Also, and I regret forgetting this, see below Justice Scalia’s internal memorandum to Justice Brennan in the Duro v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 10:33 am
  It is, however, likely to lead to further dissention on the Court, an environment described this Sunday by the NYT this way:  "According to the gossip among Supreme Court law clerks, the level of tension among the justices is higher than at any point since Bush v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:11 pm by Walter Olson
Sorry, Justice Ginsburg, but those comments about a candidate whose legal interests might well come before the Court this year were waaaay over the line [Dan Drezner; Bloomberg View editorial; Orin Kerr (“cringe-inducing”)] “In the unlikely (and horrifying) event of Bush-v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:19 pm by James Hamilton
This means that the concurring opinion tempers the Court's ruling endorsing the fraud on the market presumption of reliance in securities fraud cases announced in the 1988 Basic, Inc. v. [read post]