Search for: "KEYS v. PETERS" Results 321 - 340 of 1,138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2015, 1:42 am by David Cheifetz
Ferras; United States of America v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 4:39 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
That case, GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v Outokumpu Steamless USA, LLC, stems from a 2007 contract between a contractor and steel manufacturer for the construction of mills in the manufacturer’s steel plant. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
Thus, from an insurance coverage standpoint, the scope of coverage, if any, provided for FCA claims should be a key discussion topic during the underwriting process. 2. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In this case, Senior Judge Peter O'Brien reviewed the doctrine in the context of a slip-and-fall case that arose out of a cafeteria food fight.Relying primarily on the assumption-of-risk case of Carrender v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In this case, Senior Judge Peter O'Brien reviewed the doctrine in the context of a slip-and-fall case that arose out of a cafeteria food fight.Relying primarily on the assumption-of-risk case of Carrender v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:47 am by Hayleigh Bosher
IP law might not be a high-risk first-year module where PAL can boost pass rates, but in a final year an improved student performance can impact positively on degree classification.Technology and innovative methods to incorporate into our teaching is addressed in Part V. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:21 pm
Strauss's article summarizing the key issues surrounding the PCAOBcase and laying the groundwork for the forthcoming discussion. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 10:15 am
AmLaw reports:Securities law bloggers have been spilling virtual ink all week on the Second Circuit's July 22 ruling in  Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:57 am by Nabiha Syed
” And finally, David Hudson of First Amendment Center discusses the effects of another First Amendment case, Garcetti v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Indeed, it is this relationship which gives rise to the duty imposed upon the doctor to properly treat his or her patient (see Bazakos v Lewis, 12 NY3d 631, 634; Payette v Rockefeller Univ., 220 AD2d 69, 72; Ellis v Peter, 211 AD2d 353; Heller v Peekskill Community Hosp., 198 AD2d 265; LoDico v Caputi, 129 AD2d 361, 363; see also Speigel v Goldfarb, 66 AD3d 873, 874). [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:32 am by Jordan Brunner
Peter Margulies examined Judge Gorsuch’s misplacement of his characteristic empathy in Kerns v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Michael Knapp shared news that defendants in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  The Privacy and Information Law Blog summarises some of the key provisions adopted by the Council. [read post]