Search for: "Kaufman v. Kaufman"
Results 321 - 340
of 601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2013, 6:09 am
Asked to account for an intervening change in the law based on First Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Kaufman v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm
Kaufman. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The Appellate Division, Second Department, has held in its June 15, 2016 decision in Schiero v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The Appellate Division, Second Department, has held in its June 15, 2016 decision in Schiero v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
In the case of Janus v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:30 am
Jones v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:54 am
In the wake of the filing of the Petition for Review in Duran v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
The second argument of the day will be BP PLC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 4:43 am
Accordingly, the approach taken by Kaufman is unsupported and will not be permitted. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 11:32 am
Gideon v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:29 am
We find, however, that, inasmuch as the causes of action alleging fraud were properly dismissed (see Kaufman v Torkan, 51 AD3d 977, 980; Weitz v Smith, 231 AD2d 518), the plaintiff cannot establish that the defendants committed malpractice by failing to take an appeal from that order (see Suffolk Ave. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:05 am
[Eric Baxter on Ricks v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:49 pm
Relying on two recent taxpayer favorable decisions, Kaufman v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
The Court noted that in Kaufman v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
However, as argued by Harris, equitable estoppel may be invoked to defeat a statute of limitations defense where the "'plaintiff was induced by fraud, misrepresentations or deception to refrain from filing a timely action'" (Kaufman v Cohen, 307 AD2d 113, 122, 760 N.Y.S.2d 157 [1st Dept 2003] quoting [*8] Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442, 448-449, 377 N.E.2d 713, 406 N.Y.S.2d 259 [1978]). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:36 am
Kaufman v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 10:34 am
Motion to Compel and for Sanctions: GMAC Bank v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 11:43 am
In Kaufman v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:26 am
Kaufman, P.C., 156 AD3d 436, 66 N.Y.S.3d 474 [1st Dept 2017]).The allegations [*2] that plaintiffs were subjected by defendant Father Reilly to a barrage of vulgar, misogynous and ageist remarks and epithets, which defendants Robert Richard and Greg Manos echoed, condoned, and amplified, state causes of action under the New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107) for gender and age discrimination through a hostile work environment (see… [read post]
