Search for: "Kaufman v. Kaufman" Results 321 - 340 of 612
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by James Romoser
The second argument of the day will be BP PLC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 4:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the approach taken by Kaufman is unsupported and will not be permitted. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:29 am
We find, however, that, inasmuch as the causes of action alleging fraud were properly dismissed (see Kaufman v Torkan, 51 AD3d 977, 980; Weitz v Smith, 231 AD2d 518), the plaintiff cannot establish that the defendants committed malpractice by failing to take an appeal from that order (see Suffolk Ave. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
[Eric Baxter on Ricks v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:49 pm by admin
Relying on two recent taxpayer favorable decisions, Kaufman v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, as argued by Harris, equitable estoppel may be invoked to defeat a statute of limitations defense where the "'plaintiff was induced by fraud, misrepresentations or deception to refrain from filing a timely action'" (Kaufman v Cohen, 307 AD2d 113, 122, 760 N.Y.S.2d 157 [1st Dept 2003] quoting [*8] Simcuski v Saeli, 44 NY2d 442, 448-449, 377 N.E.2d 713, 406 N.Y.S.2d 259 [1978]). [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 11:01 pm
Kaufman & Broad Home Corp. (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 908, a class is properly defined in terms of ??? [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:26 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Kaufman, P.C., 156 AD3d 436, 66 N.Y.S.3d 474 [1st Dept 2017]).The allegations [*2]  that plaintiffs were subjected by defendant Father Reilly to a barrage of vulgar, misogynous and ageist remarks and epithets, which defendants Robert Richard and Greg Manos echoed, condoned, and amplified, state causes of action under the New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107) for gender and age discrimination through a hostile work environment (see… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:35 am
Kaufman noted in his report that he had not reviewed all of Pisano's medical records because Pisano "failed to provide the Medical Board with this essential material. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To be sure, the limitations period for fiduciary duty claims involving fraud is six years plus two years from when a reasonable person knew or should have known about the fraud (Kaufman v Cohen, 307 AD2d 113, 119 [1st Dept 2003], see Aozora Bank, Ltd. v Credit Suisse Group, 144 AD3d 437, 438 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]