Search for: "Kennedy Thomas"
Results 321 - 340
of 4,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2010, 8:54 am
Writes Harvard lawprof Randall Kennedy: Liberalism has made racial homogeneity uncool and unacceptable. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 3:06 pm
Thomas and Alito have agreed 91% of the time, while the figure for Thomas and Roberts is 87%. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 9:59 am
J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which KENNEDY, GINSBURG, BREYER, ALITO, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., joined, and in which THOMAS and GORSUCH, JJ., joined except as to Part III. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:07 am
Justice Thomas joined except for Part II. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:44 am
Justice Kennedy filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Thomas, Alito and Sotomayor. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:03 am
Kennedy and Clarence Thomas joined. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:44 am
Justice Kennedy filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Thomas, Alito and Sotomayor. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 2:22 pm
” Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice Kennedy also changed their minds, persuaded by the rookie justice in Foucha. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 6:26 am
Last night President Trump and Justice Kennedy had the ceremonial swearing in at the White House. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 9:35 pm
That fifth vote, if it comes, usually comes from the Chief or Kennedy, both of whom are senior to RBG. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:53 pm
The Court was unanimous in the judgment, but not in the reasoning--the Chief (surprisingly, sans pithy quips) wrote for the Court; Justice Scalia concurred (angily) in the judgment, joined by Justices Kennedy and Thomas; and Justice Alito separately concurred in the judgment. [read post]
23 May 2017, 5:00 pm
[CorporetteMoms] * It was great that Justice Thomas sided with the majority in the North Carolina gerrymandering case, but here's the skinny on why Justice Kennedy didn't sign on as well. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:51 pm
Justices Roberts, Scalia, Alito, and Kennedy dissented. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:37 am
In an opinion by Justice Thomas, joined by Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan, and Justice Scalia concurring in part, the Court held that a naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated, but determined that cDNA is patent eligible because it is not naturally occurring. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 7:28 pm
Or maybe it is Justice Thomas. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:35 pm
In a rare close decision in patent cases, Justice Gorsuch (joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito) provided a textual explication of the inter partes review (IPR) statute in deciding that the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:14 pm
Justice Thomas (joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan) held that, based on the "focus" of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:43 pm
Justice Ginsburg wrote for Justice Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, and Kagan. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:31 am
. [*] I suppose the dream remains alive if the next retirement were Justice Kennedy or Justice Thomas. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:25 am
The Court split 5-4; Breyer wrote for Thomas, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, while Alito dissented joined by the Chief, Scalia, and Kennedy. [read post]
