Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 321 - 340
of 626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am
Kent Scheidegger reports at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger looks at the week ahead at the Court. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:50 am
Kent Scheidegger comments on the case at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 8:17 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger summarizes some of the capital cases on next week’s “long Conference,” at which the Justices will consider all of the petitions for certiorari that have accumulated over the Court’s summer recess, and links to a spreadsheet that lists all of the sixty-eight capital cases on the Conference. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:43 am
Kent Scheidegger was another contributor, and described himself as “holding up one side versus four others,” but I’m not sure our legal analyses weren’t that different. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Plata) pending appeal; the most recent filing – as Kent Scheidegger reports at Crime and Consequences – is the state’s actual appeal. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:56 pm
Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan.To discuss the case, we have Kent Scheidegger, who is the Legal Director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:56 pm
Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan.To discuss the case, we have Kent Scheidegger, who is the Legal Director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am
Amy Howe has posted details on the opinion here; other coverage comes from Kent Scheidegger at C&C Blog and Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 5:53 am
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses Monday’s summary reversal in Nevada v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am
Additional coverage of McQuiggin comes from Jaclyn Belczyk of Jurist, Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal, and Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:05 am
Circuit – has joined the administration in urging the Court to take up this case; at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses Noel Canning’s request and examines the additional question presented that Noel Canning has proposed. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
” Other reports come from Kent Scheidegger at C&C Blog and Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:48 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger links to a report in the San Jose Mercury-News (which Cormac covered in yesterday’s round-up) on California’s filing of a notice of appeal indicating that it will ask the Court to review an order requiring California to decrease its prison population. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:45 pm
Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences has this incisive critique of Erwin Chemerinsky's article in the National Law Journal. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger reports that Justice Scalia denied a stay application submitted by Texas death row inmate Carroll Joe Parr. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:08 am
Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences notes that the petition “curiously omits any significant defense of the President’s remarkable assertion at the root of the case,” and opines that, even if all of the petition’s arguments are true, “the judgment below, even if not the opinion in its entirety, would still be obviously correct. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:06 am
Lyle reports on the argument for this blog, with further coverage coming from Kent Scheidegger of the Crime and Consequences blog. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:38 am
This case considers whether and under what circumstances a defendant who refused to answer questions from officers before he had been arrested or read Miranda rights was protected by the Self-Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment.To discuss the case, we have Kent Scheidegger, who is the Legal Director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:38 am
This case considers whether and under what circumstances a defendant who refused to answer questions from officers before he had been arrested or read Miranda rights was protected by the Self-Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment.To discuss the case, we have Kent Scheidegger, who is the Legal Director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
