Search for: "Kent v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 779
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague and whether a ruling to that effect would be retroactive. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:15 pm
Fairchild (Eds.), Investigating Christian Privilege and Religious Oppression in the United States, (Sense Publishers, Dec. 2008), reviewed in the Ames Tribune. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
Conagra Poultry Co., 378 F.3d 790, 799 (8th Cir. 2004) (race discrimination) ($600,000); Kent v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
 The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed Jones's conviction `because of admission of the evidence obtained by warrantless use of the GPS device. . . . [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:04 pm by Don Cruse
In re Frank Kent Motor Co. d/b/a Frank Kent Cadillac, No. 10-0687 (DB). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:26 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Starting at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, January 12, 2011, the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in Pavsek v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Amanda Rice
United States and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd,… [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that in Royal v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:17 am by Joshua Matz
United States, holding that evidence obtained through a search that was legal when it was conducted will not be subject to the exclusionary rule. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:18 am by Nabiha Syed
United States continues this week. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
  Kent Scheidegger reports at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
Humanists’ membership of SACREs Humanist UK reports that Kent County Council has decided not to appeal the judgment in R (Bowen) v Kent County Council [2023] EWHC 1261 (Admin). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost remarks that given the justices’ ostensible concern “about the risk of diplomatic friction between the United States and other countries when they decided to bar suits in U.S. courts against foreign corporations for violations of international law” last week in Jesner v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:51 am by Amy Howe
” Yesterday the Court issued a decision in United States v. [read post]