Search for: "King v. Waters" Results 321 - 340 of 487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics 1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor   Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and  Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment 1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William   On Conveyancers' Evidence 1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas   On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:53 pm by Richard Renner
Qui tam is short for a Latin phrase that loosely translates: "He who sues on behalf of the king and himself. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
., 2001), lettuce, spinach, and water (Friedman, et al., 1999). [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Ltd v Phonographic Performance Limited (1709 Copyright Blog) Indian ‘Bayh Dole’ problems: some resources (Spicy IP) Patent scoreboard: January 2010 (Patent Circle) Bombay High Court declines to hear interim compulsory licensing applications; shows the Appellant the way to the Copyright Board: Music Choice India Pvt Ltd v Phonographic Performance Ltd (Spicy IP) Payyanur Ring geographical indication: religious sentiment no bar to registration: Payyannur Pavithra Ring,… [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:40 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Larsen Decision The first was Larsen v Larsen (2022 NY Slip Op 32415(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County July 18, 2022]), in which Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman considered and rejected a pre-answer dismissal challenge to a shareholder derivative suit based upon the suing minority shareholder’s alleged conflict of interest. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
On Thursday, the Supreme Court released its decision in Brownback v. [read post]