Search for: "Kraft v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Actor Mechanism Incentive Examples States Enforcement Legal sanction ·       Mandatory human rights information disclosure: California ·       Mandatory human rights due diligence: Germany ·       Import/Export Regulations: WROs, Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act Consumers Boycott Litigation Market pressure Legal sanction ·       Consumer… [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:06 pm
Scruggs," state Supreme Court public information office Beverly Kraft said, "and submitted a request to the Mississippi Supreme Court for appointment of a special judge. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Cyber Insurance Does not Cover Hacking into Vendor’s Computer System   In Kraft Chemical Company, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am by Eric Goldman
Incorrect guesses included Disney (2 teams), Proctor & Gamble, Nike and Kraft. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
 As this piece was being written, a “new arrival” is Kraft Foods Global, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 1:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Pom’s fallback argument was that its ads were only potentially misleading under the terrible Pearson v. [read post]
  Updated draft guidelines have not been released by the agencies, but the agencies have stated a goal of releasing new guidelines by the end of this year. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]