Search for: "LEAF v. STATE"
Results 321 - 340
of 382
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2010, 9:19 pm
(See Martinolich v. golden Leaf Management, Inc., 786 So.2d. 613 (3rd DCA 2001)). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 7:05 am
"); Leaf v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:31 am
(Abbott) v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 4:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 7:20 am
Eddie's Leaf Spring Shop & Towing LLC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 8:07 am
(loose-leaf) becomes volumes (loose-leaf) p. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:12 pm
" The Prowel court puts a fig leaf on this, sying that Bibby didn't present enough evidence to show gender stereotyping. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 8:43 am
Irish v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:23 pm
The opinion is Farrell v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
V. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:38 pm
P. 23(b)(3) and in the analogous class action rules of virtually every state. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
(with files from Alex Dimson, student-at-law) provided different perspectives on public health class actions, such as SARS and Maple Leaf. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:14 pm
Brown Jr. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:49 am
Posts by Lyle Denniston here and here provide the basic story of Hayes, which will appear (and may be reported) to be just a technical little statutory interpretation case: The Court has issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
Given that Membership of the EU is dependent upon Member States adhering to the Convention, does the UK intend to pull out of Europe or alternatively implement the ECtHR decision in Hirst v UK(No2)? [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
Furthermore, we conclude that, because "the analysis employed by this [C]ourt in the prior appeal no longer reflects the current state of the law, the doctrine of law of the case should not be invoked to preclude reconsideration of" Charter Oak's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for compensatory damages (Szajna v Rand, 131 AD2d 840, 840; see Foley v Roche, 86 AD2d 887, lv denied 56 NY2d 507). [read post]
