Search for: "LONG v. PARKER" Results 321 - 340 of 667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2014, 11:08 pm by Timothy Sandefur, guest-blogging
Parker—which held that a legislature’s acts are “well-nigh conclusive” of constitutionality—and Williamson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:15 pm by Michelle Lindo McCluer
  At this, Judge Tozzi broke in again and asserted that military justice has come a long way from the pre-UCMJ days. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am by Robert Liles
”[3] This Proposed Rule set out the enrollment revocation and denial changes CMS planned to implement in an effort to address long-standing program integrity risks that have previously been exploited in the past. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says qualified immunity cannot attach at this early stage of the case.The case is Mehaylo v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:26 am by By Rose Saxe, AIDS Project
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could no longer refuse to recognize marriages of same-sex couples in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am by Jani Ihalainen
 The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Delaware marks 70th anniversary of its role in landmark Brown v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
I would imagine that the Court of Appeals (Sack, Parker and Goldberg [D.J.], initially reacted that way when they reviewed the record in this case. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 10:19 am by Robert Liles
Commenting on the subsequent conviction of the defendant, a DOJ official noted stated that the owner of the chain of hospice agencies had “funded his lavish lifestyle by exploiting patients with long-term, incurable diseases by enrolling them in expensive but unnecessary hospice services. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm by Robert Liles
Background of the Medicaid After-Hours Claims Issue: The non-emergency use of hospital emergency room services by Medicaid participants has been a long-standing problem of almost four decades. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:54 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In likewise rejecting that claim the Court stated: "blight is an elastic concept that does not call for an inflexible, one-size-fits-all definition (see Berman v Parker, 348 US 26, 33-34 [1954]). [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:35 am
Lake Erie Corr    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0334n.06 Parker v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:35 am
Lake Erie Corr    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0334n.06 Parker v. [read post]