Search for: "LOWE v. US "
Results 321 - 340
of 11,033
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2023, 7:55 am
The plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 3:21 pm
In Counterman v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
We use PitchBook to create our dataset of about 150,000 directors of private firms. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
Holmes, III in Doe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
A. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm
The court suggested that even minimal human involvement could meet the low threshold for copyrightability. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In Beltran v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:55 am
By invoking a later Lochner-era case, Eisner v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am
Another significant legal battle involving murals and VARA unfolded in the case of Kerson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 11:11 am
Copyright trolls are serial plaintiffs who use search tools to identify technical, often low-value infringements on the internet, and then seek nuisance settlements from many defendants. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 9:09 am
by Dennis Crouch Ontel Products Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am
Secondary meaning generally requires a showing that the design: has been in substantial commercial use (as shown by marketing budgets and materials, number of sales, surveys, and the like)the source has used the design continuously and exclusively (at least 5 years), and is distinctive (relative to other similar products).Trade dress protection can be raised as a legal claim in a law suit against, for example, someone selling or manufacturing knockoff products, such as in the … [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
Another example is Google’s $5 billion lawsuit for tracking users’ incognito sessions in Brown v Google LLC. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:08 am
–Emoji GmbH v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
The ease of use, efficacy, and efficiency [read post]
