Search for: "Labelle v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 8,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2014, 5:55 am
… As the United States correctly observes, the regulation “reflect[s] the agency’s balance of competing considerations in a specific setting that could easily be upset by the intrusion of a general private remedy such as that provided under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am
The decision in Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) clarifies the application of the statutory defence of honest opinion under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
" Good v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:04 pm
All One God Faith, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:59 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Overturning a nearly three-decade old legal precedent, a New York appellate court this week ruled that a statement labeling someone as gay cannot be defamatory per se.In the seven-page decision by the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Third Judicial Department in the case, Yonaty v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 6:23 am
It states that generic drug manufacturers cannot be sued for failing to warn consumers of dangerous side effects, as long as their labels mirror brand labels. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:03 am
** FDA Updating Requirements for “Healthy” Claims on Food Labeling ** One of the trending areas we have blogged about last year was “healthy” claims in food labelling becoming the new “all natural” target; see Hunter v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:03 am
** FDA Updating Requirements for “Healthy” Claims on Food Labeling ** One of the trending areas we have blogged about last year was “healthy” claims in food labelling becoming the new “all natural” target; see Hunter v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 8:31 pm
The petition of the day is: PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Rost v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:50 pm
Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 4:00 pm
This was not a preemption case about a state labeling law, the Court stated, but a case of two federal laws that "complement each other in the federal regulation of misleading labels. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 9:14 pm
The company argues that the state law is pre-empted by a federal law requiring drug labels to be approved by the FDA.The question on which the Supreme Court granted cert in Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
Wyeth contended that once the FDA has approved a drug’s label, a state-law verdict may not find the label inadequate. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:21 am
Once again the RIAA has commenced a "John Doe" case targeting North Carolina State University students, this one entitled Arista v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:55 pm
Tobacco companies are facing a blizzard of illegitimate class actions and class certifications over light cigarettes in state court. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:48 am
Turtle Island Foods SPC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 2:00 pm
FDA Authority Preempts State Tort Suits Over Antidepressant Drug Warnings COLACICCO V. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 2:11 pm
The Caronia Effect For this reason, many observers saw the December 2012 decision in United States v. [read post]
