Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 321 - 340 of 6,726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2009, 1:37 pm
As was recently reported on this blog, this past May the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Ashcroft v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 9:15 am by Unknown
More info is provided in this blog post.Related post:- Regional Focus: United States (11 Jan. 2023) [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
If the proposed exchange does not occur, the land will continue to be owned by the United States. [read post]
§ 1447(d) generally provides that “an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal,” the United States Supreme Court explained in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm by Cicely Wilson
United States, United States Supreme Court (3/10/14)Real Estate & Property Law, Transportation Law, Zoning, Planning & Land UseThe General Railroad Right-of-Way Act of 1875 provides railroad companies “right[s] of way through the public lands of the United States,” 43 U.S.C. 934. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:04 am by Native American Rights Fund
Legislation Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/115_uslegislation.html The following bill was added: H.R.3688: To transfer administrative jurisdiction of certain Federal lands from the United States Army Corps to the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, to take such lands into trust for the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:04 am by Native American Rights Fund
Legislation Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/115_uslegislation.html The following bill was added: H.R.3688: To transfer administrative jurisdiction of certain Federal lands from the United States Army Corps to the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, to take such lands into trust for the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 2:01 pm by admin
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:49 am by NCC Staff
The committee said it was clear, to it, that “the 14th amendment to the Constitution has no effect whatever upon the status of the Indian tribes within the limits of the United States,” but that “straggling Indians” were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm by Bryan W. Wenter and Ronny Clausner
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm by Josh Blackman
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:03 pm by Jon Robinson
This morning, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in a Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act decision out of the Ninth Circuit: Roberts v. [read post]