Search for: "Law v. United States Department of Agriculture" Results 321 - 340 of 633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
Don't have any now.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESNO. 08-998JAN HAMILTON, CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE, PETITIONER v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Amr al-Azm, associate professor at Shawnee State University, drew attention to the importance of Syrian cultural heritage and the importance of non-state actors to preserve it. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:02 am by Lyle Denniston
Perry – constitutionality of California’s “Proposition 8″ ban on same-sex marriage; also, question of standing to appeal Wednesday, March 27: 12-307 — United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:14 am by Keahn Morris
By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, AB 1291 imposes a state-mandated local program and authorizes the Bureau of Cannabis Control, the Department of Food and Agriculture, and the State Department of Public Health to revoke or suspend a license for a violation of these requirements. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 10:45 am by Robert Brammer
To experience the benefits of the House Communications search form, try this search for Executive Communications regarding final rules transmitted by the Department of Agriculture’s Farm Credit Administration to the House Committee on Agriculture. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
United States and argues that “the lopsided win illustrates the need for a federal statute defining the default mens rea (guilty mind) to be proven in criminal cases. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Town of Barnstable v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
Department of Agriculture, the “raisin case” from last Term. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am by Abbott &amp; Kindermann
The Governor, when acting upon a concurrence request from the United States Department of the Interior for the location of a new tribal casino, is not subject to CEQA. [read post]