Search for: "Leathers v. Leathers"
Results 321 - 340
of 501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2011, 11:53 am
Park & Sons Co., 220 U.S. 373 (1911) rested upon “infirm economic rationales”, and in any event, has been explicitly overruled in Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:38 pm
Leather Crafted Prods., Inc., 218 USPQ 827, 828 (TTAB 1993). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:51 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.July 13 - 10 AM: Rocket Trademarks Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:13 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
001518950 - written in ‘futura’ type and modified graphically), in relation to several classes of goods, including Class 18 (leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes; animal skins; trunks; valises; umbrellas; parasols; walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlery) and Class 25 (clothing, footwear; headgear). [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:36 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:36 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 12:41 pm
A recent decision from the Third Circuit, Arena v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 12:41 pm
A recent decision from the Third Circuit, Arena v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 12:42 pm
The oral argument (transcript here) in the case of Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
ABA Section of Antitrust Law Spring Meeting 2016: Clarifying liability in hub-and-spoke conspiracies
4 May 2016, 10:08 am
On the other hand, ever since the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
Leegin Creative Leather Products v . [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:11 pm
General Electric Co., 272 U.S. 476 (1926) was implicitly overruled by the Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 4:04 am
Danier Leather Inc., 2007 SCC 44. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In American Needle, the Court stripped the National Football League of Section 1 immunity by holding that the NFL is not entitled to the single entity defense under Copperweld and instead, its conduct must be analyzed under the “flexible” rule of reason.[25] And last year, in NCAA v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 9:27 am
ART v OHIM (C-171/06 P): It is necessary, in any event, to reject T.I.M.E. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 7:51 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm
David LaChapelle v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:36 am
Leegin - The Supreme Court's recent decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
