Search for: "Leisure v. Leisure"
Results 321 - 340
of 672
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2013, 3:40 am
Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:24 am
Bibliographical details can be found here, and the contents can be perused at your leisure here. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:11 am
To make this argument, Digital River relied on Datamize, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 2:48 pm
., v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 12:45 pm
Royal Eastwood Park is a substantial estate, with communal facilities which include a leisure center and swimming pool, the latter heated by gas. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
This is not an article about leisure reading of ebooks. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 7:04 am
” Lord Sumption, albeit with the benefit of later CJEU decisions in FAPL v QC Leisure and Infopaq II that were not available to Proudman J or the Court of Appeal, has made a clear statement that there is no policy reason why mere watching and listening (as opposed to downloading or printing) should be regarded as an infringement in the online world any more than in the offline world. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:53 am
Lord Sumption, albeit with the benefit of later CJEU decisions in FAPL v QC Leisure and Infopaq II that were not available to Proudman J or the Court of Appeal, has made a clear statement that there is no policy reason why mere watching and listening (as opposed to downloading or printing) should be regarded as an infringement in the online world any more than in the offline world. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Florida v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 12:32 pm
In this Scottish case the parties were aware that in Football Association Premier League v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
"The numerous ills associated with workers' compensation claimants abusing prescribed opioids is a perfect example of medical care professionals acting in haste in a manner that results in claimants and workers' compensation insurers repenting at leisure. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:40 am
This was to be a time of complete and uninhibited leisure and merrymaking. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:39 am
I wanted to see how the NetFlix culture fit within the confines of workers' compensation law.I didn't find any cases where NetFlix was the party defendant.That doesn't mean there aren't any, just that WorkCompCentral's archive didn't contain any such cases.There was one case where "NetFlix" did come up in the search, and that is an unpublished case out of the 5th Appellate District entitled American Home Assurance v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:24 am
In the newly published decision of Benjamin v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am
But it was this very question that the Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit considered this month (January 2013) in Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am
But it was this very question that the Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit considered this month (January 2013) in Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:50 am
So it was fun to see the oral argument before the Court in Gabelli v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 6:20 am
In Miller v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:00 am
This morning the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Football Association Premier League Ltd v QC Leisure and Others [2012] EWCA Civ 1708, dismissing the appeal brought by FAPL. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 10:31 am
Clinton/Gore (v. [read post]
