Search for: "Lewis v. AT&T Corporate"
Results 321 - 340
of 441
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Ho, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Houston, Texas, David B. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:27 am
As stated in Phillips v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
My immediate reaction is that it shouldn’t be unless it is absolutely necessary. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
")The Clash - "Midnight Log" ("Cooking up the books / A respected occupation / The anchor and foundation of multi-corporations / They don't believe in crime / They don't know that it exists / But to understand / What's right and wrong / The lawyers work in shifts. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:24 am
Justice Lewis, however, queried: "But aren't we trying to determine the standard for all contract cases? [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am
"These are legitimate concerns," concedes Lewis Morris, chief counsel for the Department of Health and Human Services’ unusually powerful Inspector General’s office, which is a key player in the search for ways to combat recidivism among pharmaceutical companies. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
Mr Justice Tugendhat meanwhile will hear an adjourned application in the case of The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley v British Broadcasting Corporation (initially listed on 27 January 2010 before Mr Justice Supperstone in the interim applications court). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
Now the managing partner of the Albuquerque office of Jackson Lewis, Danny W. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 2:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
I can't confirm. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:46 pm
Just Film, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
The Association of Corporate Counsel's (AAC) website carried a summary of the ruling authored by Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP that stated: Vice Chancellor Laster ruled from the bench that confirmatory discovery—like formal discovery—requires the defendant’s attorney to be physically present during the collection of electronically stored information from his/her client; self collection by the client is not permitted. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:14 am
Adler v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 1:34 pm
The case of Exxon Corporation v Exxon Insurance Consultants Ltd (1981) 3 All ER 241 is a leading English precedent where copyright was refused for the word Exxon as an original literary work.Exxon argued it enjoyed copyright in the word Exxon having invested time and energy in employing linguists to invent the word, contending that the actual size of the literary work doesn't preclude a work from acquiring copyright protection. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
” Lawyer Mark Lewis pointed out that people don’t always go after the “deep pocketed defendant”; sometimes the company goes for the individual. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 11:52 am
Lewis, 473 A.2d 805 (Del. 1984), which applies when a particular transaction is being challenged. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 10:14 am
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:58 am
Moreover, the order is apparently limited to the pertinent issues, and doesn't permit a fishing expedition into the attorney's impressions of the case or contacts with his clients: If Southern District of New York Judge Lewis A. [read post]
