Search for: "Light v. Board of Education"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am
Additionally, although the success of a film does not automatically prove the social acceptance of its title and of a word sign of the same name, it is at least an indication of such acceptance which must be assessed in the light of all the relevant factors in the case in order to establish the perception of that sign in the event of use of that sign as a trademark.As said above, the movie spawned a further two sequels with the same name, all of which have had great success, and is used in… [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am
Additionally, although the success of a film does not automatically prove the social acceptance of its title and of a word sign of the same name, it is at least an indication of such acceptance which must be assessed in the light of all the relevant factors in the case in order to establish the perception of that sign in the event of use of that sign as a trademark.As said above, the movie spawned a further two sequels with the same name, all of which have had great success, and is used in… [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am
Additionally, although the success of a film does not automatically prove the social acceptance of its title and of a word sign of the same name, it is at least an indication of such acceptance which must be assessed in the light of all the relevant factors in the case in order to establish the perception of that sign in the event of use of that sign as a trademark.As said above, the movie spawned a further two sequels with the same name, all of which have had great success, and is used in… [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:30 am
Additionally, although the success of a film does not automatically prove the social acceptance of its title and of a word sign of the same name, it is at least an indication of such acceptance which must be assessed in the light of all the relevant factors in the case in order to establish the perception of that sign in the event of use of that sign as a trademark.As said above, the movie spawned a further two sequels with the same name, all of which have had great success, and is used in… [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:23 am
Kansas v. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
In the 1998 case of Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:55 am
The local Board of Education, as a party in interest on the forfeiture, objected on the grounds that filing the motion was the unauthorized practice of law. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
(f) trade marks which are contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of moralitySubsequently, also the EUIPO Fifth Board of Appeal and the General Court (T‑69/17) upheld the initial EUIPO decision. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
The MA v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
FDA Licensure Process and U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Once again, a Justice Dollinger opinion, here in Messsinger v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:40 pm
See, e.g., Wodohodsky v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:01 pm
| Furry thoughts on Sky v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 7:00 am
Citizen oversight boards are non-existent. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Over thirty years ago, Chief Justice Dickson for the Supreme Court of Canada stated in Action Travail des Femmes v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
| The IPKat congratulates two new IP silks | A Creative Commons-Licensed Work Walks into a Copy Shop - Great Minds v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:45 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has scheduled eight (8) oral hearings for the month of February 2020. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 11:49 am
V. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 6:09 am
Aside from the tax issue addressed herein (and people used to say 1/3 for the husband, 1/3 for the wife and 1/3 for the government – though the numbers never actually worked that way), what is the justification for giving the income earner more than the recipient in light of Crews v. [read post]
