Search for: "Light v. Light" Results 321 - 340 of 41,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2020, 9:50 am by Evan Schwartz
The Case This proposed class action was brought by Missouri hair salon company Studio 417 and four restaurant operators – Grand Street Dining, LLC, GSD Lenexa, LLC, Trezomare Operating Company and V’s Restaurant, Inc. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:50 pm
Marco Longobardo (Univ. of Westminster - Law) has posted The Standing of Indirectly Injured States in the Litigation of Community Interests before the ICJ: Lessons Learned and Future Implications in Light of The Gambia v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:44 am by CivPro Blogger
Yesterday’s Supreme Court order list includes “GVRs” in two class actions, remanding them “for further consideration in light of Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 7:24 pm by appealattorneylaw
  If you recall, Hernandez concerns the issue of advising criminal defendants of the immigration consequences of their pleas, in light of the United States  Supreme Court decision, Padilla v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 3:30 am
The driver instead allegedly drove through the light because the light was green. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:07 am by Green
Supreme Court's ruling this week in American Electric Power v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:05 pm by Ben Allen
  Additionally, he appealed his sentence in light of the United States Supreme Court’s 2017 decision in Dean v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
Upping the rhetorical ante, Metro Lights accused the City of "auction[ ing] off First Amendment rights" to the highest bidder, in this case CBS. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:25 pm
Yesterday the Florida Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:52 am by Brian Cordery
Thus, a prior art description of a bicycle implies two wheels, handle bars, and probably pedals but not lights and gears. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 6:09 am by Unreported Opinions
(filed Aug. 2, 2021) (Rodgers I) in light of the Court’s decision in Lopez-Villa v. [read post]