Search for: "Long v. Griffin"
Results 321 - 340
of 397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 3:14 pm
INS v. [read post]
Deborah Tuerkheimer’s Judging Sex & The En Banc Opinion That Reversed The Rape Shield Killing Ruling
17 May 2012, 7:06 am
Exhibit A of this phenomenon in Tuerkheimer‘s article is the initial Sixth Circuit opinion in Gagne v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:45 am
In the first case (RK v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Louis V. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:30 pm
” Justice Kavanaugh’s concurring opinion in NCAA v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
Professor Hamilton blogs at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Redmond v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm
Dissent: The $500 limit is not too low, and the $3k limit is no different from the prohibition on foreign contributions upheld in Bluman v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
.'"] From the Florida Court of Appeal's decision yesterday in CNN, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 07, 2008 US v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm
Not surprisingly, the FDA in its full “Environmental Assessment of Factors Potentially Contributing to the Contamination of Romaine Lettuce Implicated in a Multi-State Outbreak of E. coli O157:H7,”[3] concluded that the risk of environmental contamination was in fact a well-known and long-standing risk: Food safety problems related to raw whole and fresh-cut (e.g., bagged salad) leafy greens are a longstanding issue. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm
”[58] Other long-term problems include the risk for hypertension, proteinuria (abnormal amounts of protein in the urine that can portend a decline in renal function), and reduced kidney filtration rate.[59] Since the longest available follow-up studies of HUS victims are 25 years, an accurate lifetime prognosis is not readily available and remains controversial.[60] All that can be said for certain is that HUS causes permanent injury, including loss of kidney function,… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
”[58] Other long-term problems include the risk for hypertension, proteinuria (abnormal amounts of protein in the urine that can portend a decline in renal function), and reduced kidney filtration rate.[59] Since the longest available follow-up studies of HUS victims are 25 years, an accurate lifetime prognosis is not readily available and remains controversial.[60] All that can be said for certain is that HUS causes permanent injury, including loss of kidney function,… [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am
The basic legal ontology of the classical tradition was set long before, and independently of, the civic republicanism of the Renaissance and early modernity that influenced (some of) the framers. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
